ارائه مدل تسهیل تجارت فرامرزی در ایران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت بازرگانی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران

2 دانشیار گروه مدیریت بازرگانی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران

3 استاد گروه مدیریت بازرگانی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران

10.29252/bar.2022.10913.2843

چکیده

تسهیل تجارت فرامرزی یک از شاخص‌های اصلی توسعه کشورها بر اساس تحقیقات سازمان ملل است. سیاست‌گذاران بخش تجاری کشور نیز بر اهمیت بهبود این شاخص تاکید دارند. با این حال علی­رغم اهتمام سیاست­گذاران برای بهبود این شاخص تاکنون مدل و یا مطالعات جامعی برای بهبود این شاخص در کشور ارائه نشده و بر اساس گزارش بانک جهانی، رتبه ایران همواره پایین بوده است. بر این اساس این پژوهش با هدف دستیابی به مدلی در حوزه تسهیل تجارت فرامرزی انجام شده است. به منظور شناسایی مولفه‌ها و ارتباط میان آنها برای تبیین دقیق تسهیل تجارت از روش تحقیق کیفی و مبتنی بر رویکرد نظریه برخاسته از داده‌ها استفاده شده است. در این پژوهش با صاحب­نظران بخش خصوصی و دولتی و دانشگاهی به عنوان ذی­نفعان اصلی، مصاحبه انجام شده است. نتایج تحلیل داده‎‌های حاصل از مصاحبه‌ها طی فرآیند کدگذاری باز، محوری و انتخابی منتج به ارائه مدل تسهیل تجاری گردیده است. در این تحقیق 312 مفهوم، 25 مقوله و 7 مقوله کلان استخراج شده است. بر اساس مدل حاصل از تحقیق، دو مولفه تعیین استراتژی‌های توسعه تجاری و اقتصادی از طریق ایجاد یکسان­سازی فرآیندها و قوانین و ایجاد زنجیره تامین پایدار می‌تواند باعث تسهیل تجارت گردند. در تسهیل تجاری نیز ساده­سازی و همنوا­سازی و هماهنگ­سازی پیامد مدل است.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Providing a model to facilitate cross-border trade in Iran according to the grounded theory

نویسندگان [English]

  • Behnam Amiri 1
  • Habibolahh Danaei 2
  • Mohammad Mehdi Parhizkar 2
  • Mirza Hassan Hosseini 3
1 Phd Student, Faculty of Management, Payame Noor University, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Faculty of Management, Payame Noor University
3 Professor, Faculty of Management, Payame Noor University
چکیده [English]

Introduction: In recent years, the concept of trade facilitation has received unprecedented attention, so trade facilitation has become an essential part of trade negotiations. The term ‘trade facilitation’ is widely used by institutions seeking to improve and facilitate regulatory relations between governmental agencies and traders. According to the United nation, trade facilitation is one of the main indicators of the development in a country. Policy makers in trade area also emphasize the importance of improving this indicator.
The international trade environment is a complex environment; in the process of cross-border trade (export, import and transit), at least 60 different work procedures can be observed. These procedures increase the cost and time of the business and complicate it. In our country, the concept of trade facilitation has long been considered by various stakeholders in public and private institutions. As far as the Ministry of Industry, Mines and Trade, Customs, Ports and Maritime Organization, and Health and Plant Licensing Organization are concerned, various measures have been taken in the field of trade facilitation. Some of the measures taken in the country include the establishment of integrated and electronic systems such as comprehensive trade system and single window, the elimination of some redundant rules and processes in customs and licensing organizations, and the formation of trade facilitation working groups and deregulation boards. However, despite the efforts of policy makers to improve this index, Iran's rank has been low. No comprehensive model or studies have been presented to improve this index in Iran.
Methodology: This research aims to achieve a model to facilitate cross-border trade. In other words, it seeks to identify the components of trade facilitation and their relationships and to create a balance among them, which facilitates and increases supervision. Therefore, the questions to answer are ‘What are the main components of improving the business environment and facilitating cross-border trade in the country?’, ‘What is the relationship between the components and the indicators of trade facilitation?’, ‘What is their impact on the business environment?’ and ‘What are the main obstacles to improving the business environment and facilitating the country's trade?’ It can help to establish comprehensive measures in this area.
To identify variables and the relationships among them, the research methodology is qualitative and based on the grounded theory. The research also benefits from the expertise of the private, governmental and academic sectors as the main stakeholders of trade facilitation. Accordingly, 21 experts have been interviewed on the issue. The results of the data analysis through open coding,  axial coding  and selective coding have led to the presentation of a trade facilitation model.
Results and Discussion: In this research, 312 concepts, 25 categories and 7 macro categories have been extracted and examined. The components of determining business and economic development strategies, which can facilitate the trade, are the creation of processes, coordination of regulations and creation of sustainable supply chains. Simplifying and coordinating the model is a desirable outcome in business facilitation. Determining long-term and stable strategies in economic and trade fields is one of the items that, according to the research results, should be emphasized so as to facilitate trade in the country. According to the interviewees, there is no clear and defined model for these strategies in the country. These factors have not been mentioned in other research works as the priorities of business facilitation. Another factor suggested as an obstacle to trade facilitation in the country is the emphasis on the close monitoring of documents and procedures. This has led to the fact that most of the existing laws are strictly codified and the procedures are time-consuming and increase the cost of commercial transactions. In the research model proposed here, an attempt is made to create a balance between monitoring and facilitation. Indeed, trade facilitation is achieved through simplification and coordination while paying attention to regulatory procedures. In the research conducted in other countries, the contrast between these two issues is not very noticeable, but, during the interviews, the stakeholders mentioned this issue in Iran frequently.
Conclusion: The purpose of the research is to provide a model to facilitate cross-border trade in the country.  With a qualitative method based on the grounded theory, various stakeholders were interviewed to determine the components of business facilitation.  In the next step, using axial and selective coding, the relationships among the components were determined, and the research model was presented. In this study, 312 concepts, 25 categories and 7 macro categories were extracted. As the components were identified, there emerged a lot of overlap between them and those in other studies.
In addition to interviews for data collection, direct observation and document analysis were done too. The research emphasizes the knowledge and experience of the interviewees. Therefore, it can be expected to provide deeper insights into trade facilitation by using broader sources and making observations over a longer period of time. Like most studies based on the data theory, the findings of this study are based on the views and experiences of individuals and the conditions of the research environment, so the results can be generalized to similar conditions and environments. There are certain suggestions to make for future research. Firstly, due to the fact that the coefficient of influence and the dependence of the components are not determined in the model of this study, it is advisable to determine the relationships among those components using quantitative methods such as interpretive-structural modeling. In addition, considering that a comprehensive model has not been presented in the country to create an effective and efficient model for monitoring cross-border trade processes, conducting research in this regard can contribute to trade facilitation. It should be noted that trade facilitation measures are highly interrelated, although they are often cited as independent elements. So, a systematic, integrated, step-by-step approach must be proposed in order for measures to be effective. In this regard, examining the priority of actions and their order using quantitative research methods can help to develop and implement a proper model.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Cross-border trade
  • trade facilitation
  • Trade
  • Grounded theory
Beverelli. C, Neumueller. S, The. R.  (2015). Export Diversification Effects of the WTO Trade Facilitation Agreement. World Development, Volume 76, Pages 293-310.
Cantore. N, Cheng. C. F. C. (2018). International trade of environmental goods in gravity models, Journal of Environmental Management, Volume 223, Pages 1047-1060.
Cheong. J, Kwak. D. W, Tang. K. K,. (2018).The trade effects of tariffs and non-tariff changes of preferential trade agreements. Economic Modelling. Volume 70, Pages 370-382
Clark, X., D. Dollar, and A. Micco. 2004. “Port Efficiency, Maritime Transport Costs, and Bilateral Trade.” Journal of Development Economics, vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 417-450.
Corbin, J. & Strauss, A. L. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage. London.
Creswell, J. W. (2005). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, N. J.: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.
De, Prabir. 2007. “Impact of Trade Costs on Trade: Empirical Evidence from Asian Countries.” Working Paper Series, No. 27. New York: Asia-Pacific Research and Training Network on Trade.
Dennis, A., Shepherd, B., Sep. 2007. Trade costs, barriers to entry, and export diversification in developing countries. Policy Research Working Paper Series 4368, The World Bank.
Duval. Y, Wang. T, Utoktham. C, (2016), Next-generation Trade Facilitation for Asian Integration: Cross-border Paperless Trade, ENSCAP.
Duval. Y, Wang. T, Utoktham. C, Kravchenko. A, (2019), Next-generation Trade Facilitation for Asian Integration: Cross-border Paperless Trade, Journal of Asian Economic Integration.
Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia (ESCWA). (2011). Key Factors in Establishing Single Windows for Handling Import/Export Procedures and Formalities: Trade Facilitation and the Single Window.
ESCAP. (2013). Designing and implementing trade facilitation in asia and pacific.
Fan. H., Gao. X., Amber Li. Y., Luong. T.  A., (2018). Trade liberalization and markups: Micro evidence from China. Journal of Comparative Economics, Volume 46, Issue 1, Pages 103-130.
Grainger, A. (2007). Trade Facilitation and Supply Chain Management: a case study at the interface between business and government. London, Birkbeck, University of London. PhD: 448.
Grainger. A., (2008), Customs and Trade Facilitation: from concepts to implementation, World Customs Journal, vol 2.no 1.
Lee, H., Kim, C. (2016). The Impact of Trade Facilitation on the Extensive and Intensive Margins of Trade: An Application for Developing Countries, Journal of East Asian Economic integration, Vol. 16, No. 1 (March 2012) 67-96.
Makepe. P. M., Montsi. K,. Njoku C. (2012). Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) enabled trade facilitation in Botswana. PULA: Botswana Journal of African Studies. Vol 26, No 1.
Marie, I. Pellan, M., (2011). Wong Trade Facilitation in ASEAN and ASEAN+1. Chapter 3.
Martinez-Zarzoso, I. and L. Marquez-Ramos. 2008. “The Effect of Trade Facilitation on Sectoral Trade.” B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, vol. 8, issue 1, article 42.
Mello, J & Flint, D. (2009). 'A refined view of Grounded Theory and its application to logistics research", Journal of Business Logistics, 30(1), 107-125.
Miroudot, S., Sauvage, J., Shepherd, B., Dec. 2010. Measuring the cost of international trade in services. MPRA Paper 27655, University Library of Munich, Germany.
OECD , (2018), Trade Facilitation and the Global Economy.
ORLIAC. T, (2012), The Economics of Trade Facilitation. Phd thesis, Institut d’Etudes Politiques de Paris.
Paudel. Ramesh Chandra, (2019), Trade Facilitation in South Asia: Landlocked Countries’ Perspective, Springer Singapore,  pp 71-93. 
Persson, Maria. 2008. “Trade Facilitation and the Extensive and Intensive Margins of Trade.” Lund University Department of Economics Working Paper. Lund: Lund University.
Portugal-perez. A., Wilson. J. s., (2011), Export Performance and Trade Facilitation Reform: Hard and Soft Infrastructure, World Development Vol. 40, No. 7, pp. 1295–1307.
Sadikov, Azim. 2007. “Border and Behind-the-Border Trade Barriers and Country Exports.”IMF Working Paper No. 07/292. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
Staples, B., 2002. Development, Trade and the WTO. B. Hoekman, A. Mattoo, Ch. Trade Facilitation: Improving the Invisible Infrastructure
Strauss, AL., & Corbin, JM. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, 2nd ed., Thousand Oaks, California.
Turnovsky.  S J., Rojas-Vallejos. Jorge., (2018).The distributional consequences of trade liberalization: Consumption tariff versus investment tariff reduction. Journal of Development Economics, Volume 134, Pages 392-415.
UNCEFACT, 2018, Trade Facilitation Implementation Guide.
UNNExT, 2010, Best Practice in Single Window Implementation: Case of Singapore’s TradeNet.
WCO, 2018, WTO Agreement on Trade Facilitation.
WEF (world economic forum), (2015), The Global Enabling Trade Report, the Global Alliance for Trade Facilitation.
Wilson, J. S., C. L. Mann, and T. Otsuki. 2003. “Trade Facilitation and Economic Development: A New Approach to Quantifying the Impact.” World Bank Economic Review, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 367-389.
Wilson, J. S., Otsuki, T., Dec. 2007. Regional integration in south asia : what role for trade facilitation ? Policy Research Working Paper Series 4423, The World Bank.
Wilson. J S., Mann C. L., Otsuki. T.(2005). Assessing the Benefits of Trade Facilitation: A Global Perspective”. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3224.