The Challenges of Promoting the Effectiveness of E-Commerce Agencies from the Viewpoint of Government Policymakers

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Professor of Management, Faculty of Administrative and Economic Science, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

2 Assistant Professor of Management, Faculty of Administrative and Economic Science, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

3 PhD. Candidate of Management, Faculty of Administrative and Economic Science, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

Abstract

The advent of information and communication technology today has opened up new opportunities for the growth and development of countries around the world. E-government is one of the important phenomena of the use of information and communication technology that has made many changes in the way of today's human life and has created new expectations. Governments need to use a variety of channels to deliver services that enable citizens to get the services they need at anytime, anywhere in the information technology context, to meet these expectations. Government service counter offices are one of the communication channels in Iran where government agencies provide services to citizens. Accordingly, the present study aims to identify the issues and challenges facing the counter offices in the framework of the interpretive paradigm and the qualitative approach. The target community is to identify challenges, experts, and practitioners, especially in the field of e-government and counter offices in Khorasan Razavi province. The intuitive judgment method was also used by snowball sampling technique to select the experts for the interviews. The main source of data is qualitative interviews with experts. The findings were interpreted in the context of the MaxQDA software and identified challenges in four domains of governance and policy making, service delivery organizations, counter offices and office customers. Finally, based on the identified challenges, strategies are presented in two policy-approach and executive-operational dimensions, which can be accepted in the policy-approach dimension of service firms as a subject in the field. The key to e-government and the institution of trustee for these firms is pointed out. In the executive and operational dimension, it is also suggested to revise and amend the bylaws as well as to use the ratings of firms to solve problems related to the quantitative and unbalanced development of e-services firms.

Keywords


Alston, R. (2003), E-government benefits study, Available at: http://www.agimo.gov.au/archive/__data/assets/file/0012/16032/benefits.pdf.
Bakunzibake, P., Grönlund, A. and Klein , G. O. (2019), Organisational Challenges in the Implementation of ‘one-stop’ e-Government in Rwanda, Electronic Journal of e-Government, 17(1), 1-19.
Bhuiyan, S. H. M. (2010), E-government in Kazakhestan: challenges and role to development, Public Organize Review, 10(1), 31-47.
Bhuiyan, S. H. M. (2011), Modernizing Bangladesh public administration through e-governance: benefits and challenges, Government Information Quarterly, 28, 54-65.
European Commission. (2004). "Multi-channel delivery of e-Government services". Enterprise DG Interchange of Data between Administratiins Programme, Amesterdam, Netherland.
Faith, M. Noshadi, M.(2010).  Qualitative content analysis of research, Volume 3, Number 2, 15-44.
Fang, Z. (2002), E-government in digital era: concept, practice and development. International journal of the Computer, the Internet and Management, 10(2), 1-22.
Gallego-Álvarez, I.; Rodríguez-Domínguez, L. and García-Sánchez, I.M. (2010), Are determining factors of municipal e-government common to a worldwide municipal view? An intra-country comparison, Government Information Quarterly, 27, 423-430.
Glyptis, L., Christofi , M., Del Giudice, M., Vrontis, D.,Salomi, D and  Michael, P. (2020), E-Government implementation challenges in small countries: The project manager's perspective, Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 152, 119880.
Gouscos, D.; Mentzas, G. and Georgiadis, P. (2001), Planning and Implementing e-Government Service Delivery: Achievements and Learnings from On-line Taxation in Greece, 8th Panhellenic Conference on Informatics, Nicosia, Cyprus, 8-10, November, 1-8.
Groznik, A. and Trkman, P. (2009), Upstream supply chain management in e-government: The case of Slovenia, Government Information Quaterly, 26, 459-467.
Haghighi Nasab, M .; Qasemi, S .; Turkman, M .; Qasemi, A. (2015), Identifying the factors affecting the acceptance of e-government services from the perspective of the citizens under study: Government counter offices in Tehran, Journal of Business Management, Volume 10, Number 27, 101-121.
Haghighi Nasab, M.; Abedin, B.; Janfeshan, Sh. (2008). Electronic services in the offices of communication services and police + 10 from the perspective of Tehran citizens, Journal of Management Research, No. 4, 153-131.
Hosseini Shoar, M.; Esfandiari Moghadam, A.; Zarei, A.; Hassanzadeh, M. (2017), Investigating the Factors Affecting the Adoption of Web 2.0 Technology in e-Government from the Perspective of Citizens and Presenting a Model: The Case of Government Counter Offices in Hamadan Province, Journal of Human-Information Interaction, Volume 4, Number 3, 60-71.
Janssen, M. and Kleivink, B (2009), The role of Intermediaries in Multi-Channel Service Delivery Strategies, International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 5(3), 36-46.
Lee, J. and Kim, J. (2007), Grounded theory analysis of e-government initiatives: Exploring perceptions of government authorities, Government Information Quarterly, 24, 135-147.
Ndou, V. (2004), E-government for developing countries: Opportunities and challenges, EJISDC, 18(1), 1-24.
Njuru, J. (2011), Prespectives of Kenyan students in the United States on e-government and citizens, participation, adisseration for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Public Policy and Administration, Walden University.
Norrris, D. F.; Kreamer, K. L. and Holden, S. H. (2001). "Is your local government pluggedin? Highlights of the 2000 electronic government survey". Prepared for International City/Country Management Association (ICMA) and Public Technology Inc (PTI), University of Maryland, Baltimore  County, February 27, 1-16.
Pourbagheri, M. (2014), A Study of the Factors Affecting the Acceptance of Electronic Services of Government Counter Offices as a Service Channel in Mashhad, Published Master's Thesis, Ferdowsi University, Mashhad.
Reddick, Ch. G. and Turner, M. (2012), Channel choice and public service delivery in Canada: Comparing e-government to traditional service delivery, Government Information Quarterly, 29, 1-11.
Stauffcher, G. (2002), E-government as an instrument of pubic management reform, Second E-government Conference, Kuwait Chamber of Commerce and Industry, 22-24 April, 1-32.
Verdegem, P. and Verleye, G. (2009). "User-centered e-government in practice: A comprehensive model for measuring user satisfaction".  Government Information Quarterly, 26, 487-497.