طراحی و تبیین الگوی همکاری-رقابت: مورد مطالعه گروه سایپا

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت بازرگانی، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی

2 دانشیارگروه مدیریت بازرگانی، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی

3 استاد گروه مدیریت بازرگانی، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی

چکیده

کسب موقعیت رقابتی و ارتقاء رقابت‌پذیری یکی از مهم‌ترین چالش‌های شرکت‌ها است. همکاری-رقابت به معنی همکاری و رقابت هم‌زمان شرکت‌ها، راهبردی است که به‌منظور کسب، حفظ و ارتقاء جایگاه رقابتی در دو دهه اخیر موردتوجه بسیاری از شرکت‌ها قرارگرفته است. صنعت خودروسازی دنیا یکی از صنایعی است که در استفاده از این راهبرد پیشگام بوده است. شرکت­های خودروساز ایرانی هم به دنبال رقبای جهانی خود از این راهبرد استفاده کرده­اند. اما بررسی‌های انجام­گرفته حاکی از این است که تاکنون الگویی از همکاری-رقابت در صنعت خودروسازی ایران شناسایی نشده است. این پژوهش با رویکرد کیفی و استراتژی نظریه پردازی داده بنیاد به شناسایی و تبیین الگوی همکاری-رقابت در گروه خودروسازی سایپا می پردازد. جامعه آماری این پژوهش گروه خودروسازی سایپا است که با استفاده از روش نمونه­گیری هدفمند تا رسیدن به اشباع نظری با تعداد 15 نفر از خبرگان و مدیران این گروه مصاحبه شده و 10 مستند مورد بررسی قرار گرفته است. نتایج حاصل از پژوهش حاکی از آن است که الگوی همکاری-رقابت در گروه خودروسازی سایپا شامل دو بخش اصلی است. بخش اول شامل محرک‌های همکاری-رقابت که شامل دودسته کلی از محرک‌های داخلی و خارجی با محوریت منابع و قابلیت‌ها است و بخش دوم به قالب و شکل همکاری خودروسازان با رقبا می‌پردازد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Identifying and Explaining a Model of Coopetition: A Case Study of SAIPA Group

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mahdi Mohammadi 1
  • Bahman Hajipour 2
  • Mohammad Reza Hamidizadeh 3
1 Ph. D student at the Faculty of Management & Accounting of Shahid Beheshti University
2 Associate Professor at the Faculty of Management & Accounting of Shahid Beheshti University
3 Professor at the Faculty of Management & Accounting of Shahid Beheshti University
چکیده [English]

One of the significant challenges of companies is achieving a competitive position and promoting competitiveness. Coopetition, which means the simultaneous cooperation and competition of companies, is a strategy which has attracted the attention of many companies for the last two decades. The strategy has been used to achieve, maintain and promote competitive positions. Iranian automobile companies have also used this strategy following their global competitors. However, as some studies indicate, it has not been modeled in Iran’s automotive industry yet. Indeed, it is not obvious what type of coopetition model is implemented in Iran. This paper aims to identify and explain a coopetition model in Iran’s automotive industry using qualitative methodological tools and the grounded theory. The statistical population of this study is SAIPA Group, and the sampling method is theoretical sampling. Until theoretical saturation was reached, 15 experts and managers of this group were interviewed, and more than 10 documentaries were reviewed. The results showed that the coopetition pattern in SAIPA has two main parts. The first part includes coopetition drivers which involve two general categories of internal and external drivers based on resources and capabilities, and the second part deals with the type of cooperation between automakers and competitors.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Inter-firm relationships
  • Grounded theory
  • Competition
  • Cooperation
  • Coopetition

مراجع

  1. Afuah, A. (2000). How much do your co-opetitors' capabilities matter in the face of technological change? Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 387–404.
  2. Afuah, A. (2004). Does a focal firm's technology entry timing depend on the impact of the technology on co opetitors? Research Policy, 33(8), 1231–1246.
  3. Aghajani, T., Rezazade, A. & shoghi, B. (2014). A Study of Strategic Alliance on Organizational Performance: Case of Alliance between Arak Roll Aluminum and Pars Aluminum, Strategic management research, 20 (55), 9-34.
  4. Barretta, A. (2008). The functioning of co-opetition in the health-care sector: An explorative analysis, Scandinavian Journal of Management, 24(3), 209–220.
  5. Bengtsson, M., & Johansson, M. (2014). Managing coopetition to create opportunities for small firms. International Small Business Journal, 32(4), 401–427.
  6. Bengtsson, M. and Kock S. (1999). Cooperation and competition in relationships between competitors in business networks. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 14(3), 178–190.
  7. Bengtsson, M., & Kock, S. (2000). “Coopetition” in business networks—to cooperate and compete simultaneously. Industrial Marketing Management, 29(5), 411–426.
  8. Bengtsson, M., Johansson, M., Näsholm, M., & Raza-Ullah, T. (2013). A systematic review of coopetition; levels and effects at different levels. 13th EURAM Conference, Istanbul, Turkey, June 26-29.
  9. Bengtsson, M., & Raza-Ullah, T. (2016). A systematic review of research on coopetition: Towards a multi-level understanding. Industrial Marketing Management, 57, 23-39.
  10. Bouncken, R. B., & Fredrich, V. (2012). Coopetition: Performance implications and management antecedents. International Journal of Innovation Management, 16(05), 1250028-1-28.
  11. Dai, L. (2008). Maximizing cooperation in a competitive environment. Competition Forum, 6(1), 63.
  12. Ghareche, M., Hajikarimi, A., Khodadad hoseyni, S.H. & Makizade, v. (2015), Business Management Perspective, 21, 13-28.
  13. Ghobadi, S., & D'Ambra, J. (2012a). Coopetitive relationships in cross-functional software development teams: How to model and measure? Journal of Systems and Software, 85(5), 1096–1104.
  14. Gnyawali, D. R., He, J., & Madhavan, R. (2008). Co-opetition: Promises and challenges, in 21st century management. In C. Wankel (Ed.), CA: Thousand Oaks.
  15. Gnyawali, D. R., & Madhavan, R. (2001). Cooperative networks and competitive dynamics: A structural embeddeness perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 431–445.
  16. Gnyawali, D. R., & Park, B. J. (2011). Co-opetition between giants: Collaboration with competitors for technological innovation. Research Policy, 40(5), 650–663.
  17. Hamel, G., Doz Y. and Prahalad C.K. (1989). Collaborate with your competitors and win. Harvard Business Review, 67(1), 133–139.
  18. Ho, H., & Ganesan, S. (2013). Does knowledge base compatibility help or hurt knowledge sharing between suppliers in coopetition? The role of customer participation. Journal of Marketing, 77(6), 91–107
  19. Ichijo, K. and Kohlbacher F. (2008). Tapping tacit local knowledge in emerging markets: the Toyota way. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 6(3), 173–186.
  20. Ketchen, D. J., Snow, C. C., & Hoover, V. L. (2004). Research on competitive dynamics: Recent accomplishments and future challenges. Journal of Management, 30(6), 779–804.
  21. Luo, Y. (2004). A coopetition perspective of MNC–host government relations. Journal of International Management, 10(4), 431–451.
  22. Luo, Y. (2007). A coopetition perspective of global competition. Journal of World Business, 42(2), 129–144.
  23. Luo, Y. D., Shenkar, O., & Gurnani, H. (2008). Control-cooperation interfaces in global strategic alliances: A situational typology and strategic responses. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(3), 428–453.
  24. Padula, G., & Dagnino, G. B. (2007). Untangling the rise of coopetition. International Studies of Management and Organization, 37(2), 32–52.
  25. Parzy, M., & Bogucka, H. (2014). Coopetition methodology for resource sharing in distributed OFDM-based cognitive radio networks. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 62(5), 1518–1529.
  26. Ritala, P., Golnam, A., & Wegmann, A. (2014). Coopetition-based business models: The case of Amazon.com. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(2), 236–249.
  27. Roy, P., & Yami, S. (2009). Managing strategic innovation through coopetition. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 8(1), 61-73.
  28. Rothaermel, F. (2017). Strategic Management: Concepts and cases (3th Ed). New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
  29. Quintana-Garcia, C., & Benavides-Velasco, C. A. (2004). Cooperation, competition, and innovative capability: A panel data of European dedicated biotechnology firms.Technovation, 24(12), 927–938.
  30. Simoni, M., & Caiazza, R. (2012). Interlocks network structure as driving force of coopetition among Italian firms. Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society, 12(3), 319–336.
  31. Todeva, E. and Knoke, D. (2005) ‘Strategic Alliances & Models of Collaboration’, Journal of Management Decisions, 43(1): 123-148.
  32. Wang, R., Ji, J. H., & Ming, X. G. (2010). R&D partnership contract coordination of information goods supply chain in government subsidy. International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology, 37(3–4), 297–306.
  33. Wu, Z. H., Choi, T. Y., & Rungtusanatham, M. J. (2010). Supplier–supplier relationships in buyer–supplier–supplier triads: Implications for supplier performance. Journal of Operations Management, 28(2), 115–123.
کاوش‌های مدیریت بازرگانی
دوره 10، شماره 20
بهمن 1397
صفحه 353-377

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار