تبیین مزایای همکاری-رقابت صنعت فرش دستباف ایران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 کارشناس ارشد مدیریت فرش، دانشکده هنر و معماری، دانشگاه کاشان، کاشان، ایران

2 استادیار گروه مدیریت، دانشکده علوم انسانی دانشگاه کاشان، کاشان، ایران

چکیده

هدف مقاله، بررسی مزایای همکاری-رقابت در جهت آگاه­سازی و اعتماد­سازی میان شرکت­ها مؤثر است. لذا شناسایی مزایای همکاری-رقابت با استفاده از روش مدل­سازی ساختاری تفسیری در هنر-صنعت فرش دستبافت ایران تبیین می‌شود. جامعه آماری آن متشکل از تولیدکنندگان فرش دستبافت ایران، استان قم است که با استفاده از روش  قضاوتی نمونه­گیری شده­اند. این پژوهش از نظر هدف اکتشافی و از نظر رویکرد کیفی-کمّی است و برای تجزیه و تحلیل داده­ها از سه روش تحلیل محتوا، مدیریت تعاملی و مدل­سازی ساختاری تفسیری استفاده شده است. مطابق یافته­های تحقیق در هنر-صنعت فرش دستبافت 5 مزیت اصلی در شبکه همکاری-رقابت به نام­های خلاقیت، یادگیری، بهره­وری، قدرت و توسعه وجود دارد که شناسایی روابط میان آن­ها نشان می­دهد که مزیت خلاقیت و یادگیری کلیدی­ترین عوامل هستند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Presentation of the coopetition advantages model in the art-industry of Iran handwoven carpet

نویسندگان [English]

  • Zahra Shavandi 1
  • Esmaeil Mazroui Nasrabadi 2
1 MSc, Department of Art, Faculty of Architecture and Art, University of Kashan, Kashan, Iran
2 Assistant Prof., Department of Management, Faculty of Humanities, University of Kashan, Kashan, Iran
چکیده [English]

The paper’s aim is to study the advantages of coopetition is effective for informing and trust building between companies. For this reason, identification of the advantages of coopetition directed by using the interpretative structural modeling approach. The population of research is Qom handmade carpet manufacturers that have been selected using the judgment method. This research is exploratory from the opinion of purpose and is qualitative-quantitative from the opinion of approach. Three methods have been used for data analysis that are: content analysis, interactive management and interpretive structural modelling. Based on the research findings, there are 5 main advantages at the coopetition network in the art-industry of handwoven carpet as follow: creativity, learning, productivity, ability and development that identification of the relationships between them indicates the most key factors are advantages of creativity and learning.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Art-industry of handwoven carpet
  • Advantages
  • Coopetition
  • Interpretative structural
  • Modeling
Azar, A., Khosravani, F., & Jalali, R. (2013). Soft operations research (Problems structuring approaches), First Edition. Tehran: Industrial Management Organization. [in persian].
Alipoor, V., Ahmadi, P., Khodad Hoseini, H., Moshabbaki, A. (2014). Influential factors on supplier-distributor partnership maintenance in distribution chain from the supplier’s landscape. Business Management Jornal, 5 (4), 43-60. [in persian].
Brandenburger, A., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1995). The right game: Use game theory to shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 57–71.
Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, A. M. (1996). Co-opetition. USA: Currency/Doubleday.
Bengtsson, M., & Kock, S. (2000).” Coopetition” in Business Networks—to Cooperate and Compete Simultaneously. Industrial Marketing Management, (29), 411–426.
Boswell, C., & Cannon, S. (2007). Introduction to nursing research, incorporating evidence based practice. Sudbury,Jons and Barlet.
Bengtsson, M., Eriksson, j., & Wincent, j. (2010). Co-opetition dynamics – an outline for further inquiry. Competitiveness Review, 20 (2), 194-214.
Baruch, B., & Lin. CH. P. (2012). All for one, one for all: Coopetition and virtual team performance. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, (79), 1155–1168.
Bengtsson, M., & Kock, S. (2014). Coopetition—Quo Vadis? Past accomplishments and future challenges. Industrial Marketing Management, (43), 180–188.
10. Bengtsson, M., Raza-Ullah. T., & Vanyushyn, V. (2015). The coopetition paradox and tension: The moderating role of coopetition capability. Industrial Marketing Management. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.11.008.
11. Bouncken, R., B., & Fredrich, V. (2015). Learning in coopetition: Alliance orientation, network size, and firm types. Journal of Business Research, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.050.
12. Bengtsson, M., & Raza-Ullah. T. (2016).  A systematic review of research on coopetition: Toward a multilevel understanding. Industrial Marketing Management, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.05.003.
13. Bengtsson, M., Kock, S., Henriksson, E. L., & Näsholm, M. H. (2016). Coopetition research in theory and practice: Growing new theoretical, empirical, and methodological domains. Industrial Marketing Management, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.05.002.
14. Chin, k. s., Chan, B. L., & Lam, P. K. (2008). Identifying and prioritizing critical success factors for coopetition strategy. Industrial Management & Data Systems, (108), 437-454.
15. Corte, V. D., & Aria, M. (2016). Coopetition and sustainable competitive advantage. The case of tourist destinations. Tourism Management, (54) 524-540.
16. Czakon, W., & Czernek, K. (2016). The role of trust-building mechanisms in entering into network coopetition: The case of tourism networks in Poland. Industrial Marketing Management, (57), 64–74.
17. Chim-Miki, A. F. & Batista-Canino, R. M. (2017). Tourism coopetition: An introduction to the subject and a research agenda. International Business Review, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2017.05.003.
18. Dagnino, G. B., & Padula, G. (2002). Co-opetition strategy: a new kind of inter firm dynamics for value creation. In: Paper presented at the Innovative Research in Management, European Academy of Management (EURAM), Second Annual Conference.
19. Daneshgar, A. (2011). The unabridged Yadvareh Persian carpet (Persian-English of dictionary) Volume 1 & 2, First Edition. Tehran: print institution and Asadi Yadvareh publishing. [in persian].
20. Dana, L. P., Granata, J., Lascha, F., & Carnaby, A. (2013). The evolution of co-opetition in the Waipara wine cluster of New Zealand. Wine Economics and Policy, (2), 42–49.
21. Dorn, S., Schweiger, B., & Albers, S. (2016). Levels, phases and themes of coopetition: A systematic literature review and research agenda. European Management Journal. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2016.02.009.
22. Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research, Handbook of qualitative research. London CA: Sage.
23. Gwynne, P. (2009). Automakers hope coopetition will map route to future sales. Research Technology Management, (52), 2–4.
24. Gnyawali, D. R., & Park, B. J. (R). (2011). Co-opetition between giants: Collaboration with competitors for technological innovation. Research Policy, (40), 650–663.
25. Heshmati Razavi, F. (2002). The management of Art & Industry of Persian carpet. First Edition. Tehran: Samt. [in Persian].
26. Hong, J. F. L., & Snell, R. S. (2015). Knowledge development through coopetition: A case study of a Japanese foreign subsidiary and its local suppliers. Journal of World Business (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2015.03.003.
27. Klimas, P. (2015). Organizational culture and coopetition: An exploratory study of the features, models and role in the Polish Aviation Industry. Industrial Marketing Management (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.11.012.
28. Kargarshouraki, M., Gharibnavaz sharbiani, A. (2015). Realization of coopetition strategy based on the knowledge and trust management. 7th Iranian & 1st International Knowledge Management Conference. Beheshti Intl.Conference Center, Tehran, Iran. [in Persian].
29. Luo, Y. (2005). Toward coopetition within a multinational enterprise: a perspective from foreign subsidiaries. Journal of World Business, (40), 71–90.
30. Lopez-Gomez, J., &. Molina-Meyer, M. (2007). Modeling coopetition. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (76), 132–140.
31. Lipman, EL., Kenny M., Jack, S., Cameron, R., Secord, M., & Byrne, C. (2010).  Understanding how education/support groups help lone mothers. BMC Public Health; 10:4.
32. Lashkarbolouki, M., Khodadad Hoseini, H., Hoseini, M., & Hamidizadeh, M. (2012). Designing the Prescriptive Process Model of Robust Strategy Using Mix Method. Strategic Management Andisheh Journal, Year 6, Number 2, (12), 121-151. [in persian].
33. Lindström, T., & Polsa, P. (2015). Coopetition close to the customer — A case study of a small business network. Industrial Marketing Management, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.06.005.
34. Nasiri, m. j. (2006). The Persian Carpet, First Edition. Tehran:porrang. [in Persian].
35. Park, B. J. (R)., Srivastava, M. K., & Gnyawali. D. R. (2014). Walking the tight rope of coopetition: Impact of competition and cooperation intensities and balance on firm innovation performance.  Industrial Marketing Management, (43), 210–221.
36. Park, B. J. (R)., Srivastava, M. K., & Gnyawali. D. R. (2014). Impact of coopetition in the alliance portfolio and coopetition experience on firm innovation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, (26) 893–907.
37. Qom Industrial parks co. (2015). Report of the third year of Qom carpet business cluster. [in persian].
38. Rusko, R. (2011). Exploring the concept of coopetition: A typology for the strategic moves of the Finnish forest industry. Industrial Marketing Management, (40), 311–320.
39. Rezaei zadeh, M., Ansari, M., & Murphy, I. (2013). Practical guide of research methodology Interactive Management (IM) and Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM), First Edition. Tehran: jihad daneshgahi. [in persian].
40. Ritala, P., Golnam, A., & Wegmann, A. (2014). Coopetition-based business models: The case of Amazon.com, Industrial Marketing Management, (43), 236–249.
41. Roy, F., L., & Czakon, W. (2016). Managing coopetition: the missing link between strategy and performance. Industrial Marketing Management, (53), 3–6. 
42. Rajala, A. & Tidström, A. (2017). A multilevel perspective on organizational buying behavior in coopetition–an exploratory case study. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2017.03.002.
43. Rahmat Seresht, H., Bashokouh, M., Pahlavani Qomi, M. (2009). Factors Affecting in Succession of International Collaborations. Business Management Jornal, 1(3), 55-70. [in persian].
44. Stommel, M., &  Wills, CE. (2004). clinical research: concepts and principles for advanced practice nurses. Philadelphia. lippincott Williams and wilkins.
45. Segrestin, B. (2005). Partnering to explore: The Renault–Nissan alliance as a forerunner of new cooperative patterns. Research Policy, (34), 657–672.
46. Streubert, H. j., & Carpenter, D. (2011). Qualitative Research in Nursing: Advancing the Humanistic Imperative. Fifth edition, Lippincott wiliams & wilkins co.
47. Strese, S., Meuer, M. W., Flatten, T. C., & Brettel, M. (2015). Organizational antecedents of cross-functional coopetition: The impact of leadership and organizational structure on cross-functional coopetition. Industrial Marketing Management, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.11.006.
48. Tabatabaei, A., Hasani, p., Mortazavi, H., Tabatabaei chehr, M. (2013). Strategies for improving scientific accuracy in qualitative researches. Journal of North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences, 5(3), 663-670.[in persian].
49. Tidström, A., & Rajala, A. (2016). Coopetition strategy as interrelated praxis and practices on multiple levels. Industrial Marketing Management, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.05.013.
50. Velu, CH. (2015). Evolutionary or revolutionary business model innovation through coopetition? The role of dominance in network markets. Industrial Marketing Management, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.11.007.
51. Walley, k. (2007). Coopetition an Introduction to the Subject and an Agenda for Research. International Studies of Management & Organization. (37), 11–31.
52. Yami, S., & Nemeh, A. (2014). Organizing coopetition for innovation: The case of wireless telecommunication sector in Europe. Industrial Marketing Management (43), 250–260.