تأثیر بازی‎وارسازی بر قصد تعامل و نگرش نسبت به برند

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار گروه مدیریت دانشکده علوم اداری و اقتصاد دانشگاه ولی‌عصر (عج) رفسنجان، رفسنجان، ایران

2 استادیار گروه علوم اجتماعی و اقتصاد، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران

3 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد حسابداری، دانشگاه پیام‌نور مرکز کرمان، کرمان، ایران

10.22034/jbar.2023.17123.4039

چکیده

توسعه برنامه‎های کاربردی متعدد با ویژگی‎های بازی به روند جدید بازی‎وارسازی منجر شده است. با وجود این روند روبه‏رشد و نقش بالقوه بازی‎وارسازی، مبانی نظری بازاریابی فاقد مدل‎هایی است که استفاده از بازی‎وارسازی را در زمینه بازاریابی، ادراک مشتریان و تأثیر آن بر نگرش نسبت به برند توضیح دهند. در این پژوهش بر مبنای مدل پذیرش فناوری، مدلی برای بررسی اثرات بازی‎وارسازی بر قصد تعامل مشتریان با فرآیند بازی‎وارسازی و نگرش آن­ها نسبت به برند ارائه می‎شود. تحقیق حاضر از منظر هدف، کاربردی و با توجه به نحوه گردآوری­داده­ها، توصیفی- پیمایشی است. برای جمع­آوری داده­ها پرسشنامه استاندارد به‌کار برده شد که روایی آن از طریق روایی صوری و پایایی آن نیز با آلفای کرونباخ محاسبه گردید. از مدلسازی ­معادلات ­ساختاری و نرم­افزار لیزرل برای تجزیه و تحلیل داده­ها استفاده شد. جامعه آماری در این پژوهش کابران جوان نرم­افزارهای کاربردی پرداخت موبایلی که از بازی­وارسازی استفاده کرده­اند، در شهر کرمان بود. حجم نمونه به تعداد 392 نفر تعیین و برای انتخاب نمونه از روش نمونه­گیری در دسترس استفاده شد. نتایج به دست آمده از پژوهش نشان داد که سودمندی درک شده، سهولت استفاده درک شده، تأثیر اجتماعی درک شده و لذت درک شده به طور مثبت بر قصد افراد برای تعامل و نگرش نسبت به برند در زمینه بازاریابی بازی‎وارسازی تأثیرگذار است. همچنین نتایج این مطالعه حاکی از تأثیر مثبت قصد تعامل بر نگرش نسبت به برند بود.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

The effect of gamification on the intention of engagement and the attitude towards a brand

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mahdi Dehghani Soltani 1
  • Maryam Mesbahi 2
  • Sara Sheibani 3
1 Assistant Professor, In Management, Faculty of Administrative Sciences and Economic, Vali-e-Asr University of Rafsanjan, Rafsanjan, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Management, Economy and Accounting, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran
3 MA Student of Accounting, Payame Noor University, Kerman, Iran
چکیده [English]

Introduction: The concept of gamification and its mechanics in non-gaming environments has become a rapidly emerging practice in business, especially in marketing. In the early days of the advent of gamification, it was not felt that the roots of mechanics and techniques could easily penetrate the gaming software world. The use of gamification tools and methods can be beneficial to the organizations active in various industries, which is due to its fundamental potential in forming and influencing behavior and attitudes. An increasing number of organizations are adopting game techniques and game-style rewards to increase customer engagement. Despite the practical importance of the gamification cycle, the current gamification literature is still lacking, and it lacks scientific accuracy. In other words, a comprehensive definition of gamification has rarely been provided in scientific research on gamification in various fields. Second, since gamification is a relatively new concept, it is largely unclear how an effective design for a particular goal can be realized. Some researchers argue that most businesses pursue gamification with the goal of achieving unlikely and far-reaching success, and, as a result, most businesses use gamification as a tool to improve business processes without examining its suitability for their organization, and they do their job. Due to the poor design of gamification software programs, some procedures have failed to achieve business goals. Moreover, nowadays, gamification has increasingly been able to play a significant role in attracting customers. Many companies that seek to improve the performance of their business can use it as an important strategy to improve their business activities. Therefore, gamification is considered as a business strategy that is used by many managers in different companies in order to increase the interaction and loyalty of customers. To achieve different marketing goals, one can use dynamic and stable gamification experiences. The participants that pioneered in gamification were Coca-Cola, McDonald's, Nike and Sony. In this research, gamification is defined as a system that uses game design components in a non-game environment in order to create enjoyable experiences, and influence the attitude or behavior of users. In addition, there is no uniform approach to the successful development and implementation of gamification aspects in the existing processes. This means that there is limited knowledge of how the structural application of gamification plays in processes. Also, the effect of gamification on changing people's behavior or attitude towards different business processes has not been studied yet. Third, there is no scientific evidence of the effects or benefits of gamification. The gamification is used as a system based on new technologies in various fields. Technology acceptance theories in the field of information systems have examined the acceptance of technology-based systems. In particular, the technology acceptance model is a valid, robust, and almost simple model for predicting the user’s acceptance. This research seeks to investigate the concept of gamification in the general field of marketing and its impact on users' intentions and attitudes toward the brand by expanding the technology acceptance model. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to investigate a model that explains the role of gamification in marketing by considering the impacts of social interaction, perceived pleasure and other factors on users' intention to participate in games and their attitude towards the brand.
Methodology: The present study is an applied piece of research. In terms of data processing, the study is of a descriptive type conducted through correlation analyses. A standard questionnaire was used to measure the effect of gamification on the intention to interact and the user’s attitude towards a brand. The statistical population consisted of the young users of mobile payment software applications that used gamification (such as the app scoring system) in the city of Kerman. The available sampling method and Cochran's formula were used to obtain the sample size. In this study, structural equation modeling served to test research hypotheses and examine the relationships among the latent factors.
Results and Discussion: The significant coefficients between the perceived convenience, perceived ease of use, perceived social impact and perceived pleasure with the intention of interaction and participation were 3.73, 5.51, 3.21 and 3.11. Thus, perceived convenience, perceived ease of use, perceived social impact, and perceived pleasure have significant effects on the intention to interact and participate. The significant coefficients between the perceived convenience, perceived ease of use, perceived social impact, and perceived pleasure with the attitude toward the brand were 5.80, 6.32, 3.36, and 3.68. Thus, perceived convenience, perceived ease of use, perceived social impact, and perceived pleasure significantly affect the attitudes toward the brand. The coefficient of significance between the intention to interact and participate with the attitude towards the brand was 4.71. Therefore, the intention of interaction and participation has a significant effect on the attitudes toward the brand.
Conclusion: The study provides evidence on the effects of gamification in practice as a basis for further application of gamification in various fields. The results serve as a guide for game planners and other designers. The important factors affecting the behavior and attitudes of participants are identified, which help to conduct scientific research on the development of a technology acceptance model and demonstrate the application of that model in various areas. Finally, the relationship between the intention to interact with the gamification marketing process and the attitude towards a particular brand was studied to make marketers more aware of how to arrange their strategies to increase participants' desire to participate in the development of their marketing activities. This research fills the gap of theoretical knowledge about the relationship between the intention to interact and the attitude towards a brand.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Perceived ease of use
  • Perceived usefulness
  • Intention of engagement
  • Brand attitude
Abou-shouk, M. & Soliman, M. (2021). The impact of gamification adoption intention on brand awareness and loyalty in tourism: The mediating effect of customer engagement. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 20, 1-10.
Acar, A. (2007). Testing the effects of incidental advertising exposure in online gaming environments. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 8, 45-56.
Adis, Azaze-Azizi Abdul, & Jun, Kim Hyung. (2013). Antecedents of brand recall and brand attitude towards purchase intention in advergames.
Bauer, J.C., Linzmajer, M., Nagengast, L., Rudolph, T. & D'Cruz, E. (2020). Gamifying the digital shopping experience: games without monetary participation incentives increase customer satisfaction and loyalty. Journal of Service Management, 31(3), 563-595.
Bechler, C.J., Tormala, Z.L. & Rucker, D.D. (2019). Perceiving attitude change: How qualitative shifts augment change perception. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 82, 160-175.
Benbasat, I. & Barki, H. (2007). Quo vadis TAM? Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(4), 7-15.
Burk, B. (2013). The gamification of business. Available from: http://www.forbes. com/sites/gartnergroup/2013/01/21/the-gamification-of-business/.
Dehghani Soltani, M. & Mesbahi, M. (2020). The impact of organizational memory on the development of new products in knowledge-based companies. Journal of Business Administration Researches, 11(22), 177-196. (In Persian)
Dehghani Soltani, M., Shoul, A. & Ramezani, S. (2019). Investigating Environmental Value and Green Image Supposed Effects on the Word of Mouth Advertising Tendency by Explaining Green Trust and Willingness to Pay Roles through the SOR Model Framework. Journal of Business Management, 11(4), 804-824. (In Persian)
Denny, J. (2014). Gamification: Intrinsic motivation for lasting engagement. eLearning Industry. available at: https://elearningindustry.com/gamification-intrinsicmotivation- lasting-engagement.
Diefenbach, S. & Mussig, A. (2019). Counterproductive effects of gamification: An analysis on the example of the gamified task manager Habitica. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 127, 190-210.
Feiz, D., Dehghani Soltani, M., & Farsizadeh, H. (2019). The effect of knowledge sharing on the psychological empowerment in higher education mediated by organizational memory. Studies in Higher Education, 44(1), 1-18.
Feiz, D., Zarei, A., Maleki Minbash Razgah, M. & Shaabani Naeim Soufyani, A. (2019). The Role of Gamification as a Growth Hacking Strategy in the Adoption Disruptive Innovation Model in Mobile Payment Applications (Case study: Students of Guilan University). Journal of Technology Development Management, 7(3), 63-90. (In Persian)
Feng, W., Tu, R. & Hsieh, P. (2020). Can gamification increases consumers’ engagement in fitness apps? The moderating role of commensurability of the game elements. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 57, 111-124.
Fletcher, J.D. & Tobias, S. (2006). Expanding opportunities through on-demand learning. In T. L. Good (Ed.), 21st century education: A reference handbook. New York: Sage.
Florenthal, B. (2019). Young consumers’ motivational drivers of brand engagement behavior on social media sites: A synthesized U&G and TAM framework. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 13(3), 351-391.
Friedrich, J., Becker, M., Kramer, F., Writh, M. & Schneider, M. (2020). Incentive design and gamification for knowledge management. Journal of Business Research, 106, 341-352.
Gao, Y. & Koufaris, M. (2006). Perceptual antecedents of user attitude in electronic commerce. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, 37(2&3), 42-50.
Ghavidel, F. & Gholipour Soleimani, A. (2021). The Impact of Purchase Intention of Green Products on the Actual Purchase of products with Moderating of the Income. Journal of Business Administration Researches, 12(24), 49-75. (In Persian)
Gerdenitsch, C., Sellitsch, D., Besser, M., Burger, S., Stegmann, C., Tscheligi, M. & Kriglstein, S. (2020). Work gamification: Effects on enjoyment, productivity and the role of leadership. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 43, 1-10.
Ghorban, Z. (2012). Brand attitude, its antecedents and consequences, investigation into smartphone brands in Malaysia. Journal of Business and Management, 2(3), 31-35.
Hai, S. & Park, I.J. (2021). The accelerating effect of intrinsic motivation and trust toward supervisor on helping behavior based on the curvilinear model among hotel frontline employees in China. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 47, 12-21.
Hamari, J. & Koivisto, J. (2013). Social motivations to use gamification: An empirical study of gamifying exercise. In In proceedings of the 21st European conference on information systems, June 5e8, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Hamari, J., Koivisto, J. & Sarsa, H. (2014). Does gamification Work? A literature review of empirical studies on gamification. In Proceedings of system sciences (HICSS), 47th Hawaii international conference (pp. 3025e3034). January 6-9, Hawaii.
Hartman, J.B., Shim, S., Barber, B. & O’brien, M. (2006). Adolescents' utilitarian and hedonic web-consumption behavior: Hierarchical influence of personal values and innovativeness. Psychology Marketing, 23, 813-839.
Hatami, M. (2019). The effect of gamification on the purpose of interaction and brand attitude. Journal of proprietary advertising and marketing, 15, 105-119. (In Persian)
Herrewijn, L. & Poels, K. (2013). Putting brands into Play: How game difficulty and player experiences influence the effectiveness of in-game advertising. International Journal of Advertising, 32, 17-44.
Hidalgo-Hidalgo, M., Jimenenz, N. & Lopez-Pintado, D. (2021). Social influence and position effects. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 182, 113-131.
Hsu, C.L. & Chen, M.C. (2018). How gamification marketing activities motivate desirable consumer behaviors: Focusing on the role of brand love. Computers in Human Behavior, 88, 121-133.
Hsu, C. & Lu, H. (2007). Consumer behavior in online game community: A motivational factor perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(3), 1642-1659.
Huang, Z. & Cappel, J.J. (2005). Assessment of a web-based learning game in an information systems course. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 45(4), 42-50.
Huang, J. & Zhou, L. (2020). Social gamification affordances in the green IT services: perspectives from recognition and social overload. Internet Research, 31(2), 737-761.
Huotari, K. & Hamari, J. (2011). “Gamification” from the perspective of service marketing, CHI 2011, May 7-12.
Hwang, L. & Choi, L. (2019). Having fun while receiving rewards?: Exploration of gamification in loyalty programs for consumer loyalty. Journal of Business Research, 106, 365-376.
Jafari-Sadeghi, V., Garcia-Perez, A., Candelo, E. & Couturier, J. (2021). Exploring the impact of digital transformation on technology entrepreneurship and technological market expansion: The role of technology readiness, exploration and exploitation. Journal of Business, 124, 100-111.
Kamaruddin, A.R. & Mokhlis, S. (2003). Consumer socialization, social structural factors and decision making styles, a case study of adolescents in Malaysia. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 27(2), 145-156.
Ki, C.W., Cuevas, L.M., Chong, S.M. & Lim, H. (2020). Influencer marketing: Social media influencers as human brands attaching to followers and yielding positive marketing results by fulfilling needs. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 55, 142-155.
Koo, D.M. (2009). The moderating role of locus of control on the links between experiential motives and intention to play online games. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 466-474.
Kotler, P. (2004). Marketing management (7th ed.). India: Pearson Education.
Laroche, M., Habibi, M. R., Richard, M.O. & Sankaranarayanan, R. (2012). The effects of social media based brand communities on brand community markers, value creation practices, brand trust and brand loyalty. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1755-1767.
Lee, M. & Faber, R.J. (2007). Effects of product placement in on-line games on brand memory. A perspective of the limited-capacity model of attention. Journal of Advertising, 36, 75-90.
Lee, M.K.O., Cheung, C.M.K. & Chen, Z. (2005). Acceptance of Internet-based learning medium: The role of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation. Information & Management, 42, 1095-1104.
Li, C. (2014). Evaluation of a theoretical model for gamification in workplace is context. Doctoral dissertation. University of British Columbia.
Lin, C., Shih, H. & Sher, P.J. (2007). Integrating Technology Readiness into Technology Acceptance: The TRAM Model. Psychology Marketing, 24(7), 641-657.
Liu, Y., Chen, Y. & Fan, Z.P. (2021). Do social network crowds help fundraising campaigns? Effects of social influence on crowdfunding performance. Journal of Business Research, 122, 97-108.
McGonigal, J. (2011). Reality is Broken: Why games make us better and how they can change the world. New York: Penguin Books.
Meloni, W., & Gruener, W. M. R. (2012). Gamification in 2012. Available at: http:// goo.gl/75Ph5.
Momeni, M. & Faalghumi, A. (2019). Statistical analysis using SPSS. Tehran, Author Publications. (In Persian)
O'Neil, H. F., Wainess, R. & Baker, E. L. (2005). Classification of learning outcomes: Evidence from the computer games literature. The Curriculum Journal, 16(4), 455-474.
Owolabi, K.O. & Olu-wabi, F.E. (2009). Corporate social responsibility and crises of development in Africa. Journal of Sustainable Development in Africa, 10(4), 218-230.
Ponce, P., Meier, A., Mendez, J.I., Peffer, T., Molina, A. & Mata, O. (2020). Tailored gamification and serious game framework based on fuzzy logic for saving energy in connected thermostats. Journal of Cleaner Production, 262, 121-136.
Park, H. J. & Bae, J. H. (2014). Study and research of gamification design. International Journal of Software Engineering and Its Applications, 8(8), 19-28.
Rafique, H., Almagrabi, A.O., Shamim, A., Anwar, F. & Bashir, A.K. (2020). Investigating the Acceptance of Mobile Library Applications with an Extended Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Computers & Education, 145, 1-10.
Ramkumar, M., Schoenherr, T., Wagner, S.M. & Jenamani, M. (2019). Q-TAM: A quality technology acceptance model for predicting organizational buyers’ continuance intentions for e-procurement services. International Journal of Production Economics, 216, 333-348.
Ramayah, T.D., Tham, K.T. & Aafaqi, B. (2003b). Perceived web security and WebBased online transaction intent. Multimedia, Cyberscape Journal, 1, 131-141.
Rodrigues, L.F., Olivera, A. & Costa, C.J. (2016). Playing seriously – How gamification and social cues influence bank customers to use gamified e-business applications. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 392-407.
Rodrigues, L.F., Costa, C.J. & Oliveira, A. (2013). The adoption of gamification in ebanking. In ISDOC’13, July 11-12, 47-55.
Rughinis, R. (2013). Talkative objects in need of interpretation, re-thinking digital badges in education. In CHI’13 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems, 2099-2108.
Sallam, M.A. & Algammash, F. A. (2016). The effect of attitude toward advertisement on attitude toward brand and purchase intention. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, 4(2), 509-520.
Sarmad, Z., Bazargan, A. & Hejazi, E. (2019). Research Methods in Behavioral Sciences. Tehran, Agah Publishing Institute. (In Persian)
Spears, N. & Singh, S. N. (2004). Measuring attitude toward the brand and purchase intentions. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 26(2), 53-66.
Suhartanto, D., Dean, D., Ismail, T.A.T. & Sundari, R. (2019). Mobile banking adoption in Islamic banks: Integrating TAM model and religiosity-intention model. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 11(6), 1405-1418.
Tanouri, A., Mulcahy, R. & Russell-Bennett, R. (2019). Transformative gamification services for social behavior brand equity: a hierarchical model. Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 29(2), 122-141.
Tu, C.C., Fang, K. & Lin, C.Y. (2010). Predicting consumer repurchase intentions to shop online. Journal of Computers, 5, 1527-1533.
Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of Perceived ease-of-use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11, 342-365.
Wise, K., Bolls, P., Kim, H., Venkataraman, A. & Meyer, R. (2008). Enjoyment of advergames and brand attitudes: The impact of thematic relevance. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 9(1), 14-25.
Xi, N. & Hamari, J. (2020). Does gamification affect brand engagement and equity? A study in online brand communities. Journal of Business Research, 109, 449-460.
Xu, X. J. (2010). The effect of advertising Persuasion. Beijing Technology and Business University (Social Sciences), 25, 79-83.
Yang, L., Bian, Y., Zhao, X., Liu, X. & Yao, X. (2021). Drivers’ acceptance of mobile navigation applications: An extended technology acceptance model considering drivers’ sense of direction, navigation application affinity and distraction perception. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 145, 100-112.
Yannakakis, G.N. & Hallam, J. (2007). Towards optimizing entertainment in computer games. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 21, 933-971
Zainuddin, Z., Shujahat, M., Haruna, H. & WahChu, S.K. (2020). The role of gamified e-quizzes on student learning and engagement: An interactive gamification solution for a formative assessment system. Computers & Education, 145, 1-11.
Zhang, T., Shen, D., Zheng, S., Liu, Z., Qu, X. & Tao, D. (2020) Predicting unsafe behaviors at nuclear power plants: An integration of Theory of Planned Behavior and Technology Acceptance Model. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 80, 1-10.