الگویابی معیارهای ورودی فرآیند تصمیم‌گیری خرید در نوجوانان

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه مدیریت، واحد یزد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، یزد، ایران

2 دانشیار، گروه مدیریت، دانشگاه میبد، میبد، ایران

3 استاد، گروه مدیریت، واحد یزد، دانشگاه آزاداسلامی، یزد، ایران

4 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه میبد، میبد، ایران

10.22034/jbar.2023.17301.4060

چکیده

انتخاب غذا در گذشته و حال تحت تأثیر متغیرهای ناپایداری بوده است، ازاین‌رو مصرف‌کنندگان به‌ویژه نوجوانان فرآیندی پویا و امری حساس و پیچیده است و بی‌شک، بازاریابی صنایع غذایی بدون توجه به ملاک‌های انتخاب غذا در تصمیم‌گیری خرید امکان‌پذیر نخواهد بود. لذا هدف از پژوهش حاضر تدوین مدلی برای تعیین معیارهای ورودی فرآیند تصمیم‌گیری خرید در نوجوانان است. پژوهش حاضر، درصدد شناسایی معیارهای ورودی فرآیند تصمیم‌گیری خرید در نوجوانان از طریق کاربست روش کیفی تحلیل مضمون و مدلسازی ساختاری –تفسیری است. در بخش کیفی، معیارها به روش تحلیل مضمون استخراج ‌شده و 20 درون‌مایه و مفاهیم نهفته با ابزار مصاحبه عمیق ساختارمند از 22 نفر از نوجوانان یزدی در رده سنی10 تا 14 سال با نرم‌افزار 10Nvivo استخراج گردید و سپس با مراجعه به مقالات علمی معتبر 16 مفهوم با پشتیبانی علمی وارد مطالعه شد و 4 مؤلفه به‌عنوان مؤلفه‌های محقق ساخته مورد مطالعه قرار گرفت. در بخش کمی نیز، نظر 12 نفر از خبرگان در خصوص متغیرها با روش مدلسازی ساختاری تفسیری در قالب یک مدل کاربردی و انتزاعی با نرم‌افزارهای Excel و MICMAC ارائه شد. مطابق نتایج تحقیق علاوه بر مؤلفه‌های شناسایی ‌شده، سایر مؤلفه‌ها نیز در جامعه آماری نوجوانان مؤثر بوده و با مدلسازی ساختاری تفسیری، مدلی متشکل از این مؤلفه‌ها که بیان‌گر روابط بین آن‌هاست ارائه گردید. به‌جز مؤلفه‌های اقتباسی از مطالعات پیشین، متغیرهای محقق‌ساخته:سن بلوغ، اونجلیسم، نوستالژی و عدم امید به آینده به مدل افزوده و سطوح و جایگاه رابطه این متغیرها با سایر مؤلفه‌ها تعیین گردیده است.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Modelling for the input criteria of adolescents’ purchasing decision process

نویسندگان [English]

  • Rahele Ansari 1
  • Hamid Babaei Meybodi 2
  • Shahnaz Nayebzadeh 3
  • Shabnam Mohammadi Ardakani 4
1 PhD Student, Department of Management, Yazd Branch, Islamic Azad University, Yazd,, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Department of Management, Meybod University, Meybod, Iran
3 Professor, Department of Management, Yazd Branch, Islamic Azad University, Yazd, Iran
4 graduate student, Meybod University, Meybod, Iran
چکیده [English]

Introduction: Choice is a new concept in today's world. Most people in developed countries make more choices, both on a daily basis and in relation to their way of life, than they did a hundred years ago. A comparison of the twentieth century with the nineteenth century shows a kind of prosperity achieved through the growing systems of production and distribution, which some interpret as freedom of choice. What is clear about choice is thinking about the criteria for choosing or not choosing, and not only about the concept of how people live but also about the way they think and their identity. Choosing the right food is the first step to having a healthy society. The science of marketing seeks to influence consumer behavior. Consumers’ behavior is strongly influenced by their cultural, social, personal and psychological characteristics. Of course, marketing of the food industry is not possible without considering the criteria for choosing food in the purchasing decision. The food selection criteria in purchasing decisions have been more or less extracted in previous studies, but the relationships between such elements are complex. This complexity varies among consumers with different demographic characteristics. Among consumers in the adolescent age group, however, these differences will face other aspects of purchasing decision criteria. In addition to marketing activities, food industry marketers are concerned about adolescent food health, so are parents and organizations that support healthy nutrition. Therefore, identifying the relationships among the determinants of food choice in adolescents is an important issue that requires proper research. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to find a model to present the relationships between the extracted elements in relation to the criteria for purchasing decision-making in adolescents. Understanding the relationships among these criteria will certainly help marketers, parents, and teen nutrition organizations. Developing a model to determine the input criteria of the purchasing decision-making process in adolescents meets the purpose of the study.
Methodology: The present study is fundamental in terms of orientation and interpretive in terms of research philosophy. Its main strategy is methodological pluralism using two strategies simultaneously. It is based on a qualitative approach and is conducted through combining the two methods of thematic analysis (thematic) and modeling. In the qualitative part, the criteria were extracted by a content analysis, and 20 themes and hidden concepts were extracted from 22 Yazd adolescents in the age group of 10 to 14 years old. The analyses were performed with the 10Nvivo software through structured in-depth interviews. A science was included in the study and 4 components were studied as researcher-made components. In the quantitative part, the opinions of 12 experts, including 6 university professors and 6 managers of restaurants in Yazd were collected regarding the variables. The data were presented by interpretive structural modeling in the form of an applied and abstract model with Excel and Micmac software programs.
Results and Discussion: In this study, 107 primary codes were selected as the sample. Through repeated revisions and the integration of codes based on similarity and relevance through various stages, 14 main themes and 107 sub-themes were extracted for the concept of food choice decision by Iranian adolescents. What follows in the form of 14 categories is the result of a process that began with initial observations and considerations and the identification of indicators. Then, the obtained indicators were categorized and summarized in the form of concepts. Finally, by the integration of the concepts in a more general form, the 14 categories were studied (including, sensory attractions, lifestyle, tendency to modernity in adolescents, religious beliefs, hope for the future, hope for the future, communication, health orientation, familiarity, age of puberty, customer loyalty, ethical concerns, marketing mix and hedonic effects). The results showed that, in addition to the identified components, other components were also effective in the statistical population of adolescents. Also, by interpretive structural modeling, a model consisting of these components was presented to expresses the relationships among them.
Conclusion: Knowledge of consumer behavior is considered as an important competitive advantage which leads to a significant reduction in wrong decisions. Consumer behavior in marketing may be less considered. Through consumer behavior marketing, instead of focusing on finding the right customers for the products, one can focus on finding the right products for the customers and coordinate all the corresponding activities that affect the customers and increase profits by creating more satisfied customers. In this study, in addition to the components adapted from previous studies, variables such as puberty, eugenicism, nostalgia and hope for the future have been added to the model, and the relationships among these variables and other components are determined.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Purchasing decision model
  • Food selection
  • Adolescents
  • Thematic analysis
  • Interpretive structural modeling (ISM)
Abou Ali, A. A. K. (2021). Factors Affecting Purchase Intention in Social Media Commerce Context: Applied Study on Clothing Consumer Market in Lebanon.
Amini, A., & Alimohammadlou, M. (2021). Toward equation structural modeling: an integration of interpretive structural modeling and structural equation modeling. Journal of Management Analytics, 1-22.
Appelhans, B. M., French, S. A., Olinger, T., Bogucki, M., Janssen, I., Avery-Mamer, E. F., & Powell, L. M. (2018). Leveraging delay discounting for health: Can time delays influence food choice? Appetite, 126, 16-25.
Bandara, B., De Silva, D., Maduwanthi, B., & Warunasinghe, W. (2016). Impact of food labeling information on consumer purchasing decision: with special reference to faculty of Agricultural Sciences. Procedia Food Science, 6, 309-313.
Bennett, D. (2004). The Taiwanese are Just Like Australians in Their Loyalty to Fast Food Outlets. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ), 12(3), 97-103. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1441-3582(04)70110-X
Block, L. (2013). Food decision making. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(5), iv-vi.
Block, L., Aydino, x11f, lu, N., x, xfc, . . . Morales, A. C. (2013). Food Decision Making. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(5), iv-vi. doi:10.1086/669343
Breslin, P. A. (2013). An evolutionary perspective on food and human taste. Current Biology, 23(9), R409-R418.
Chrisinger, B. W., Kallan, M. J., Whiteman, E. D., & Hillier, A. (2018). Where do U.S. households purchase healthy foods? An analysis of food-at-home purchases across different types of retailers in a nationally representative dataset. Preventive Medicine, 112, 15-22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.03.015
DAM, T. C. (2020). Influence of brand trust, perceived value on brand preference and purchase intention. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 7(10), 939-947.
de-Magistris, T., & Gracia, A. (2017). Does hunger matter in consumer purchase decisions? An empirical investigation of processed food products. Food Quality and Preference, 55, 1-5.
Delgosha, M. S., Hajiheydari, N., & Talafidaryani, M. (2021). Discovering IoT implications in business and management: A computational thematic analysis. Technovation, 102236.
Doucerain, M., & Fellows, L. K. (2012). Eating Right: Linking Food-Related Decision-Making Concepts From Neuroscience, Psychology, and Education. Mind, Brain, and Education, 6(4), 206-219. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-228X.2012.01159.x
Drabik-Podgórna, V. (2021). Facing the Chaos of Today’s World: Life Design as a New Concept of Counselling for New Times. Czech-polish historical and pedagogical journal, 12(2), 30-42.
Drewnowski, A., Mennella, J. A., Johnson, S. L., & Bellisle, F. (2012). Sweetness and food preference. J Nutr, 142(6), 1142s-1148s. doi:10.3945/jn.111.149575
Ertz, M., & Le Bouhart, G. (2021). The Other Pandemic: A Conceptual Framework and Future Research Directions of Junk Food Marketing to Children and Childhood Obesity. Journal of Macromarketing, 02761467211054354.
Falahati, M. Alahi, A. Akbari Yazdi, H. (1396). Consumer decision-making styles of sportswear. Sports Management Studies (Research in Sports Science), 9(45), 155-174.
 Ghanbari, V.& Safaei, Sh. (2017). Structuring quality management issues with an interpretive structural modeling approach. Standard and quality management,23(7),6-15.
Gram, M., Hogg, M., Blichfeldt, B. S., & MacLaran, P. (2015). Intergenerational relationships and food consumption: the stories of young adults leaving home. Young Consumers.
Gravel, K., Doucet, É., Peter Herman, C., Pomerleau, S., Bourlaud, A.-S., & Provencher, V. (2012). “Healthy,” “diet,” or “hedonic”. How nutrition claims affect food-related perceptions and intake? Appetite, 59(3), 877-884. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2012.08.028
Haque, A., Hashim, N., & Ahmed, F. (2018). Business trends and opportunities: the emerging markets of religious food Preparation and Processing of Religious and Cultural Foods (pp. 43-56): Elsevier.
Hawkins, M., Motherbaugh, D. L., & Roger, J. (2009). Best. 2007. Consumer Behavior: Building Marketing Strategy: New York: McGraw Hill Irwin.
Heng, Y., Gao, Z., Jiang, Y., & Chen, X. (2018). Exploring hidden factors behind online food shopping from Amazon reviews: A topic mining approach. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 42, 161-168.
Hoffman, A. C., Salgado, R. V., Dresler, C., Faller, R. W., & Bartlett, C. (2016). Flavour preferences in youth versus adults: a review. Tobacco control, 25(Suppl 2), ii32-ii39.
Holsten, J. E., Deatrick, J. A., Kumanyika, S., Pinto-Martin, J., & Compher, C. W. (2012). Children’s food choice process in the home environment. A qualitative descriptive study. Appetite, 58(1), 64-73.
Hornbeck, M., Berg, A., & Price, R. (2019). P69 Fun with Fresh Food Rainbow Nutrition Program Helps Families Improve Attitudes and Behavior Around Fruits and Vegetables. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 51(7, Supplement), S63-S64. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2019.05.445
Howard, J., & Sheth, J. (1969). The theory of buyer behaviour, John Willey and sons, New York.
Huba, J., McConnell, B., & Kawasaki, G. (2012). Creating Customer Evangelists: How Loyal Customers Become a Volunteer Sales Force: Lewis Lane Press.
Johnson, S. L., Boles, R. E., & Burger, K. S. (2014). Using participant hedonic ratings of food images to construct data driven food groupings. Appetite, 79, 189-196. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2014.04.021
Ju, I., Kim, J., Chang, M. J., & Bluck, S. (2016). Nostalgic marketing, perceived self-continuity, and consumer decisions. Management Decision.
Kapuge, K. (2016). Determinants of organic food buying behavior: Special reference to organic food purchase intention of Sri Lankan customers. Procedia Food Science, 6, 303-308.
Keith, J. F., Stastny, S., Brunt, A., & Agnew, W. (2018). Barriers and Strategies for Healthy Food Choices among American Indian Tribal College Students: A Qualitative Analysis. J Acad Nutr Diet, 118(6), 1017-1026. doi:10.1016/j.jand.2017.08.003
Kollat, D. T., Engel, J. F., & Blackwell, R. D. (1970). Current problems in consumer behavior research. Journal of Marketing Research, 7(3), 327-332.
Kotler, P. (2003). Marketing Management, eleventh international edition,Prentice Hall.
Kotler, P., & Dubois, B. (2003). Marketing management. 11e éd. Upper Saddle River NJ.
L, W. W. ( 1994 ). Consumer Behavior 3ed Paperback John Wiley & Sons Inc (June 21, 1994).
Lindeman, M., & Väänänen, M. (2000). Measurement of ethical food choice motives. Appetite, 34(1), 55-59. doi:10.1006/appe.1999.0293
Longart, P. (2015). Consumer decision making in restaurant selection. Buckinghamshire New University.  
Madhavan, M., & Kaliyaperumal, C. (2015). Consumer buying behavior-An overview of theory and models. St. Theresa Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(1), 74-112.
Megharaj, B., & Anjanappa, H. A Study On Consumer Behavior In Automobile Industry With Special Reference To Small Cars In Kurnool District. Primax International Journal of Marketing (PIJM).
Michaelidou, N., & Hassan, L. (2010). Modeling the factors affecting rural consumers’ purchase of organic and free-range produce: A case study of consumers’ from the Island of Arran in Scotland, UK. Food Policy, 35, 130-139. doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2009.10.001
Nicosia, F. M. (1966). Consumer Decision Processes; Marketing and Advertising Implications.
Nia, j. Tehrani, R. Eftekhari, B, Monir. Afzali, M. H, N. (2011). Qualitative study of adolescents' views on nutritional patterns and beliefs Quarterly Journal of Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran Medical Branch,20(4),258-264.
Osei, B. A. (2022). Travel to Emerging Tourist Destinations: Motivations and Decision-Making Processes Marketing Tourist Destinations in Emerging Economies (pp. 101-119): Springer.
Palczak, J., Blumenthal, D., Rogeaux, M., & Delarue, J. (2019). Sensory complexity and its influence on hedonic responses: A systematic review of applications in food and beverages. Food Quality and Preference, 71, 66-75.
Palys, T., & Given, L. M. (2008). The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. L, M. Given (Ed.), Purposive sampling, 697-698.
Pecoraro, M., Uusitalo, O., & Valtonen, A. (2021). Experiencing ethical retail ideology in the servicescape. Journal of Marketing Management, 37(5-6), 520-547.
Pettigrew, S., Talati, Z., Miller, C., Dixon, H., Kelly, B., & Ball, K. (2017). The types and aspects of front-of-pack food labelling schemes preferred by adults and children. Appetite, 109, 115-123.
Phau, I., Quintal, V., Marchegiani, C., & Lee, S. (2016). Looking beyond pasta and pizzas: examining personal and historical nostalgia as travel motives. International Journal of Culture, Tourism and Hospitality Research, 10(3), 296-309. doi:10.1108/IJCTHR-07-2015-0073
Rahmawati, T., & Aisyah, N. (2021). Consumer Behavior In Industrial Era 4.0 To Avoid Market Failure. Jurnal Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 23(1), 1-12.
Rangel, A. (2013). Regulation of dietary choice by the decision-making circuitry. Nat Neurosci, 16(12), 1717-1724. doi:10.1038/nn.3561
Rombout, F., Schuitema, J., & Volman, M. (2022). Teaching strategies for value-loaded critical thinking in philosophy classroom dialogues. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 43, 100991.
Safavizadeh, V., Alizadeh-Sani, M., Rostami, M., Mohammadi, M. A., & Heydari, A. (2019). The Most Important Criteria for Selection of Foods in Yazd. Journal of Nutrition and Food Security.
Sanaye,S. Azargashb, A. Derisi, M, Zamani, A. Keivanfar. (1395). Survey of knowledge and attitude of medical students of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences towards the consumption of fast foods in 2015. Scientific Journal of the Organization of the Medical System of the Islamic Republic of Iran
Schäufele, I., & Janssen, M. (2021). How and why does the attitude-behavior gap differ between product categories of sustainable food? Analysis of organic food purchases based on household panel data. Frontiers in psychology, 12, 74.
Schiffman, L. G., & Kanuk, L. L. (2006). Consumer behavior.. London.: Prentice Hall.
Shamah, R. A., Mason, M. C., Moretti, A., & Raggiotto, F. (2018). Investigating the antecedents of African fast food customers' loyalty: A self-congruity perspective. Journal of Business Research, 86, 446-456.
Stewart, S. (1992). On longing: Duke University Press.
Story, M., & French, S. (2004). Food Advertising and Marketing Directed at Children and Adolescents in the US. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 1(1), 3. doi:10.1186/1479-5868-1-3.