تأثیر تحلیل بازاریابی بر کسب مزیت رقابتی پایدار از دیدگاه قابلیت‌های پویا با زیرکی بازار و مدیریت توسعۀ محصول

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 کارشناسی ارشد، گروه مدیریت، دانشکدۀ علوم اداری و اقتصادی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران

2 استاد، گروه مدیریت، دانشکدۀ علوم اداری و اقتصادی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران

3 دانشیار، گروه مدیریت، دانشکدۀ علوم اداری و اقتصادی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران

4 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشکدۀ مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران

چکیده

در صنعت پویای نرم‌افزار ایران، کسب مزیت رقابتی پایدار، اهمیتی راهبردی دارد و تحلیل بازاریابی، ابزاری کلیدی برای درک پویایی‌های بازار محسوب می‌شود. این پژوهش، به بررسی تأثیر تحلیل بازاریابی بر مزیت رقابتی پایدار با نقش میانجی زیرکی بازار و مدیریت توسعۀ محصول پرداخته است. پژوهش حاضر، از نظر هدف، کاربردی و از نظر روش، توصیفی- پیمایشی بود. جامعۀ آماری 329 شرکت فعال در تولید و پشتیبانی نرم‌افزارهای سفارش مشتری با گواهی شورای عالی انفورماتیک ایران (پایۀ 1 تا 4) می‌باشد. نمونه 177 شرکت به روش غیرتصادفی انتخاب شدند. داده‌ها با ابزار پرسش‌نامه گردآوری شد. روایی سازه با تحلیل عاملی تأییدی در نرم‌افزار AMOS و پایایی با آلفای کرونباخ تأیید گردید. یافته‌ها نشان داد تحلیل بازاریابی تأثیر مثبت و معناداری بر زیرکی بازار، مدیریت توسعۀ محصول و مزیت رقابتی پایدار دارد. همچنین، تأثیر مستقیم زیرکی بازار و مدیریت توسعۀ محصول بر مزیت رقابتی پایدار معنادار بود. نقش میانجی زیرکی بازار در رابطۀ بین تحلیل بازاریابی و مزیت رقابتی پایدار تأیید شد اما نقش میانجی مدیریت توسعۀ محصول به دلیل شرایط نامطمئن محیطی تأیید نشد. نتایج، بر ضرورت به کارگیری تحلیل بازاریابی برای تقویت قابلیت‌های پویا و پاسخگویی به تغییرات بازار تأکید دارد و پیشنهادهایی شامل تقسیم‌بندی مشتریان، بازدیدهای دوره‌ای و طراحی آمیختۀ بازاریابی هدف‌مند ارائه می‌کند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

The impact of marketing analytics on achieving sustainable competitive advantage from the perspective of dynamic capabilities with market intelligence and product development management

نویسندگان [English]

  • Masoud Abyar 1
  • Fariborz Rahimnia 2
  • Alireza Hadadian 3
  • Mohammad Sadegh Akbari Nooghabi 4
1 Master's degree, Department of Management, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
2 Professor, Department of Management, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
3 Associate Professor, Department of Management, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
4 PhD student, Department of Public Administration, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

EXTENDED ABSTRACT
 
Introduction: In the rapidly evolving software industry of Iran, the attainment of sustainable competitive advantage is of paramount strategic significance. Marketing analytics are recognized as essential tools for comprehending market dynamics. This study investigates the influence of marketing analytics on sustainable competitive advantage, emphasizing the mediating roles of market intelligence and product development management within the framework of dynamic capabilities.
Methodology: The current study employed a descriptive-survey methodology with a specific purpose. The statistical population comprised 329 companies engaged in the production and support of software for the Iranian Certificate of Excellence in Informatics, categorized into grades 1 to 4. A sample of 177 companies was selected using a non-random sampling method. Data were collected through a structured questionnaire. Construct validity was assessed using factor analysis conducted in AMOS software, while reliability was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha.
Discussion and Results: Six of the seven research hypotheses were supported by the findings. The results indicated that marketing analytics exerts a positive and significant influence on market intelligence, product development management, and sustainable competitive advantage. Additionally, the direct effects of market intelligence and product development management on sustainable competitive advantage were found to be significant. The mediating role of market intelligence in the relationship between marketing analytics and sustainable competitive advantage was affirmed; however, the mediating role of product development management was not substantiated, attributed to ambiguous environmental conditions. The findings are derived from the application of analytics aimed at enhancing operational efficiency and adapting to dynamic market fluctuations. The study offers recommendations such as customer segmentation, scheduled visits, and the implementation of a targeted design mix.
Conclusion: Practical and research proposals are articulated as follows: It is recommended that customer perspectives be categorized into three groups: critical, important, and standard customers. Periodic engagements with each customer group should be conducted, aligned with the company's capabilities and resources, following monthly, quarterly, or annual schedules for all or select groups. During these engagements, customer feedback regarding their needs and the functionalities currently lacking in the software should be systematically collected. This approach enhances the company's capacity to anticipate trends and leverage opportunities and threats, ultimately leading to the attainment of a sustainable competitive advantage. It is advised to assess customer satisfaction with various aspects of the software, facilities, and system reports during the scheduled engagements utilizing standardized measurement forms. The establishment of a comprehensive database for recording this data will facilitate accurate insights into areas requiring correction and enhancement. Considering the diversity of software products, it is suggested that the company's products be categorized into related groups according to the needs of customers (customer-oriented), and due to the increase in the effectiveness of marketing programs, the marketing mix for each category should be prepared and implemented separately. Usually, many suggestions for software development and production ideas are made by customers of software companies. Therefore, it is suggested that the development and improvement of the software be reviewed and applied by a working group consisting of at least one member of the software support unit, the sales manager, and—if possible—an expert consultant in the application field of the software (for example, if the software is accounting, an accounting field consultant). During the implementation of this research, we realized that two important variables in software companies have been hidden from our eyes: the management literacy of managers and the market context of the company. Many managers of software manufacturing companies do not have education related to management. Also, the field of the company's market is either the government market or the private market. Therefore, it is appropriate to consider these two variables in future research. The findings of this study indicate that "environmental uncertainty" is a significant variable associated with the influence of marketing analytics on sustainable competitive advantage, with product development management serving as a mediating factor. Consequently, it is recommended that future research incorporate items related to this variable as a control variable. This study employs a quantitative approach, utilizing survey data to examine the relationships among the research constructs. For a more comprehensive understanding of the topic, subsequent research could adopt qualitative methodologies.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Marketing Analytics
  • Sustainable Competitive Advantage
  • Dynamic Capability View
  • Market Acuity
  • Product Development Management
Akbari Nooghabi, M. S., Kafashpoor, A., Talebi, M. & Ramezani, O. (2025). Identifying and determining the effect of Strategic Leadership on Sustainable Competitive Advantage with the role of Social Capital and Strategic Flexibility. Journal of Business Administration Researches, 16(38), 123-139. (In Persian) https://doi.org/10.22034/jbar.2024.20776.4370
Amit, R., & Schoemaker, P. J. (2023). Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic Management Journal, 14(1), 33-46.‏ https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250140105
Balouchi, H., Maleki MinBash Razgah, M., Feiz, D., & HasangholiPour, T. (2018). The effect of Competitive Strategies, Perceptions of the Dynamic Environment and Market Orientation on Performance with Subtle Market Moderation. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 49(3), 473-486. (In Persian) https://doi.org/10.22059/ijaedr.2018.239194.668467
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
Cao, G., Duan, Y., & El Banna, A. (2019). A dynamic capability view of marketing analytics: Evidence from UK firms. Industrial Marketing Management, 76, 72-83.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.08.002
Chen, H. H., Lee, A. H., & Tong, Y. (2021). Prioritization and operations NPD mix in a network with strategic partners under uncertainty. Expert Systems with Applications, 33(2), 337-346.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2006.05.026
Coyne, K. P. (1986). Sustainable competitive advantage—What it is, what it isn't. Business Horizons, 29(1), 54-61.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813(86)90087-X
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2020). Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10‐11), 1105-1121.‏ https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E
Elsner, R., Krafft, M., & Huchzermeier, A. (2024). Optimizing Rhenania's direct marketing business through dynamic multilevel modeling (DMLM) in a multicatalog-brand environment. Marketing Science, 192-206.‏ https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1040.0063
Frösén, J., & Tikkanen, H. (2016). Development and impact of strategic marketing–a longitudinal study in a Nordic country from 2008 to 2014. European Journal of Marketing, 50(12), 2269-2294.‏ https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-10-2016-0557
Hanssens, D. M., & Pauwels, K. H. (2016). Demonstrating the value of marketing. Journal of Marketing, 80(6), 173-190.‏ https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.15.0417
Hoseinzadeh Shahri, M., & Shahini, S. (2018). The impact of Dynamic Capability and Innovation Capability on Competitive Advantage. Journal of Business Administration Researches, 10(19), 123-141. (In Persian) https://doi.org/10.29252/bar.10.18.123
Hossain, M. A., Agnihotri, R., Rushan, M. R. I., Rahman, M. S., & Sumi, S. F. (2022). Marketing analytics capability, artificial intelligence adoption, and firms' competitive advantage: Evidence from the manufacturing industry. Industrial Marketing Management, 106, 240-255.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2022.08.017
Im, S., & Workman Jr, J. P. (2004). Market orientation, creativity, and new product performance in high-technology firms. Journal of Marketing, 68(2), 114-132.‏ https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.68.2.114.27788
Kannan, P. K., Pope, B. K., & Jain, S. (2019). Practice prize winner—Pricing digital content product lines: A model and application for the National Academies Press. Marketing Science, 28(4), 620-636.‏ https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1080.0481
Kaufmann, M. (2024). Inductive fuzzy classification in marketing analytics. Springer International Publishing.‏ https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05861-0
Khoddami, S., Khodadad Hoseini, S. H., Moshabaki, A., & Azar, A. (2012). Desisgning customer agility model based on dynamic capabilities: Effect of IT Competence, Entrepreneurial Alertness and Market Acuity. New Marketing Research Journal, 2(1), 1-24. (In Persian)
Lisboa, A., Skarmeas, D., & Lages, C. (2011). Innovative capabilities: Their drivers and effects on current and future performance. Journal of Business Research, 64(11), 1157-1161.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.06.015
Morgan, N. A. (2022). Marketing and business performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40, 102-119.‏ https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0279-9
Morgan, R. E., & Berthon, P. (2018). Market orientation, generative learning, innovation strategy and business performance inter‐relationships in bioscience firms. Journal of Management Studies, 45(8), 1329-1353.‏ https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00778.x
Ojha, D., Salimath, M., & D’Souza, D. (2014). Disaster immunity and performance of service firms: The influence of market acuity and supply network partnering. International Journal of Production Economics, 147, 385-397.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.02.029
Peteraf, M. A. (2023). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: a resource‐based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14(3), 179-191. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250140303
Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive strategy: Creating and sustaining superior performance.‏ https://doi.org/10.4324/9781912281060
Powell, T. C. (2020). Total quality management as competitive advantage: a review and empirical study. Strategic Management Journal, 16(1), 15-37.‏ https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250160105
Prajogo, D. I., & Oke, A. (2016). Human capital, service innovation advantage, and business performance: The moderating roles of dynamic and competitive environments. International Journal of Operations & production management, 36(9), 974-994.‏ https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-11-2014-0537
Rackley, J. (2020). Marketing analytics roadmap. New York City: Apress.‏ https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-0259-3
Rosenzweig, E. D., & Roth, A. V. (2021). B2B seller competence: construct development and measurement using a supply chain strategy lens. Journal of Operations Management, 25(6), 1311-1331.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2007.01.007
Rumelt, R. P. (2023). What in the world is competitive advantage. Policy Working paper, 105(3), 1-5.‏
Salhab, H. A. (2024). The use of data analytics in digital marketing for sustainable business growth. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8(8), 4894.‏ https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i8.4894
Sassi, S., & Goaied, M. (2013). Financial development, ICT diffusion and economic growth: Lessons from MENA region. Telecommunications Policy, 37(4-5), 252-261.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2012.12.004
Teece, D. J. (2017). Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319-1350.‏ https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
Teece, D., & Pisano, G. (1994). The Dynamic Capabilities of Firms: An Introduction. Industrial and Corporate Change, 3(3), 537-556. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/3.3.537-a
Tomlin, B. (2024). On the value of mitigation and contingency strategies for managing supply chain disruption risks. Management Science, 52(5), 639-657.‏ https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0515
Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource‐based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171-180.‏ https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050207
Xu, Z., Frankwick, G. L., & Ramirez, E. (2016). Effects of big data analytics and traditional marketing analytics on new product success: A knowledge fusion perspective. Journal of Business Research, 69(5), 1562-1566.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.017
Yassine, A. (2018). A three-dimensional view of complex product development management. In 2018 IEEE Technology and Engineering Management Conference (TEMSCON), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEMSCON.2018.8488394