پیشران های موفقیت توسعه محصول جدید در شرکت های دانش‌بنیان

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استاد دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان

2 استادیار گروه مدیریت، دانشگاه ولایت

3 کارشناسی ارشد مدیریت کارآفرینی، دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان

4 دانشجوی دکتری کارآفرینی، دانشگاه تهران

10.22034/jbar.2022.10875.2830

چکیده

تمایز از طریق توسعه محصول جدید یکی از موثرترین راه‌ها برای کسب موفقیت است. پژوهش حاضر با هدف ارائۀ الگوی پیشران­های موفقیت توسعه محصول جدید در شرکت‌های دانش‌بنیان تولیدی کوچک و متوسط در پارک علم و فناوری فارس و با استفاده از روش فراترکیب انجام‌شده است. فراترکیب متمرکز بر مطالعات کیفی بوده، به ترجمۀ مطالعات کیفی به یکدیگر و فهم عمیق پژوهشگر برمی‌گردد. با استفاده از روش فراترکیب، 123 مقالۀ حوزۀ موفقیت توسعه محصول جدید، مورد ارزیابی قرار گرفت. در نهایت ابعاد و کدهای مربوطه با تحلیل محتوا، استخراج و اولویت و اهمیت هر کد به کمک روش کمّی آنتروپی شانون تعیین شد. بر اساس یافته‌های پژوهش مشخص شد که کدهای تمرکز بر منحصربه‌فرد بودن محصول جدید، نیاز مشتری، قابل‌رقابت بودن محصول، ایجاد ارزش برای مشتری و شاخص شدن شرکت، دارای بیشترین ضریب اهمیت می‌باشند. در نهایت پس از طی گام‌های پژوهش، الگوی پیشران‌های موفقیت توسعه محصول جدید در شرکت‌های دانش‌بنیان ارائه‌شده است.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Success drivers of new product development in knowledge-based companies

نویسندگان [English]

  • NoorMohammad Yaghoubi 1
  • Masoud Dehghani 2
  • Abdolnaser Derakhshan 2
  • Negin Ghiyasi 3
  • Malihe Omidvar 4
1 Professor, Management Department, Sistan and Baluchistan University
2 Professor Assistant, Management Department, Velayat University
3 M.A, Entrepreneurship Department, Sistan and Baluchistan University
4 Ph.d Student, Entrepreneurship Department, Tehran University
چکیده [English]

Introduction: Developing a new product in a rapidly changing competitive market is raised as a management strategy for the survival and growth of most companies. Developing a new product can create competitive advantage and new markets and ultimately increase the revenues and benefits for companies, which has become a necessity for manufacturing and industrial organizations due to the rapid advancement of technology, the increasing competition in global markets, and the increasing changes in customer needs. The process of developing a new product must respond positively to customer needs and create a proper competitive space for the organization. Developing a new product is one of the key strategies to gain a competitive advantage and maintain the organization’ growth.
Science and technology parks have been created as one of the components of national innovation systems and the infrastructures of knowledge-based economis to increase wealth in societies through encouraging and promoting the culture of innovation and increasing the power of competition among knowledge-based institutions and companies operating in the park. Science and technology parks are created through growth centers and reproductive processes and facilitate the growth of innovation-based companies in a knowledge-based economy where the production and exchange of knowledge are major factors in creating added value. Furthermore, science parks provide other value-added services, along with workspace and quality facilities, to the park’s institutions and transfer knowledge among the institutions that produce and consume knowledge. Generally, knowledge-based companies are a kind of mechanism for transferring technology from university to industry. They serve to commercialize new technologies with the results of research and development in universities. These companies can be precious because they strengthen economic sectors, grow faster than ordinary start-ups, and contribute more to economic and industrial changes in regions as well as the whole economic space around them compared to start-ups.
There are areas of imperative activity for any organization to achieve the targets it has set for ahead. They are known as critical success factors in the management literature and are considered as the integral components of an organization's success in achieving its targets. Managers of the companies located in the parks are not familiar with new product development. Hence, understanding the factors affecting the success of new product development is essential for these companies. The main question of this research is ‘what are the key factors affecting the success and development of a new product in science and technology parks?’
Methodology: The purpose of this research was to provide success-driving models of developing new products in small and medium manufacturing knowledge-based companies in Fars Science and Technology Park in 2018 using the meta-synthesis method. This method is applied to integrate several studies to achieve comprehensive and interpretive results. Meta-synthesis focuses on qualitative studies and refers to the translation of qualitative studies into each other and the researcher's deep understanding. In other words, meta-synthesis is a combination of the interpretations of the primary data in selected studies. It explores new and fundamental subjects and metaphors by providing a systematic attitude for researchers through combining different qualitative types of research. This method enhances the current knowledge and provides a comprehensive view of issues. Meta-synthesis requires the researcher to conduct a thorough and in-depth review and combine the findings of the relevant qualitative types of research. Sandelowski and Barroso's seven-step meta-synthesis method was used in this research. A total of 123 articles in the field of success in new product development were evaluated using the mentioned method, the corresponding dimensions and codes were extracted through the content analysis, and the importance and priority of each were determined using the Shannon quantitative entropy method.
Results and Discussion: The main achievement of this research is to present a model of success drivers to develop new products in knowledge-based companies, consisting of four main categories and 20 codes. These items are compiled using the meta-synthesis method. According to the results, focus on the uniqueness of the new product, attention to customer needs, creating value for the customer, indexing the company, using customer-based management systems, business strategies, learning spirit in all the members of the organization, and focus on advertising to introduce a new product to the market have the highest coefficients of importance. As the results showed, the most pivotal, effective and impressive factors can be identified in each of the quadruple dimensions, and their selected option can be used to improve performance. From a productive point of view, the most pivotal factor is human resource skills, the most effective factor is technological capability, and the most impressive factor is the amount of facility use. It is possible to increase the productivity of production facilities by improving the skills of human resources in the selected portfolio.
Conclusion: Knowledge-based companies focus on product delivery and strive to maintain and then enhance their position in the business market based on their long-term vision by adopting strategies. The strategies they emphasize for creating value for the customer are based on separate market observations and the capability for customer relationships. The use of this capability is based on directing internal processes. One of the strategies in this regard can be the provision of new products based on research and development and estimating market demand. The process of developing a new product imposes costs on the company. These costs include the cost of preliminary studies, design, and construction of prototypes, product introduction advertisements, etc. The need to pay attention to the success factors of new product development plays a vital role in conserving the company's resources and surviving in the market despite the limited financial resources in knowledge-based companies. Attention to the identified success factors in this study provides a clear view for planners, policymakers, decision-makers, managers, and activists in knowledge-based companies and helps them perform the best in the face of the business market.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Knowledge-based companies
  • Meta-synthesis
  • New product development
Aghazadeh, H., Yazdani, S. (2015). The Effect of Competitive Strategies on Market Orientation and New Product Development in Commercial Banks of Iran. Journal of Business Administration Researches, 7(14), 121-146
Annacchino, M. (2003), new product development, in: From Initial Idea to Product Management, Butterworth-Heinemann.
Asari, M, H., Hoseini Shakib, M., Khamse, A. (2017). Evaluation and prioritization the Key Success Factors of New product development. Industrial technology development. 15 (29), 27-40
Chin, K. S., Tang, D. W., Yang, J. B., Wong, S. Y., Wang, H, (2009), Assessing new product development project  risk by Bayesian network with a systematic probability generation methodology, Expert Syst. Appl. 36 9879-9890
Cooper, R.G. (1997), the dimensions of industrial new product success and failure, Journal of Marketing, 43 (3), 93-103 & 60-74.
Cooper, R.G., Kleinshmidth, E. J., (1995), Benchmarking the firms critical success factors in new product development, Journal of product Innovation management, 12 (5), 374-391
Czarnitzki, D., Rammer, C. and Toole, A. A, (2014), “University spin-offs and the performance premium”, small Business Economics, 43 (2), 309-326
Griffin, A., (1997), “PDMA Research on New Product Development Practices Updating trends and Benchmarking Best Practices”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol.14, 429-458
Harmancioglu, N., Droge, C., & Calantone, R. (2009), Strategic fit to resources versus NPD execution proficiencies: What are their roles in determining success? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 37 (3), 266-282
Hart, S., (1993), Dimension of success in new product development: An Explanatory investigation “, Journal of Marketing management, Vol.13, 478-496
Helm R, Mauroner O, Dowling M. (2010), Innovation as mediator between entrepreneurial orientation and spin-off venture performance. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 1 (11), 427-91
Ho, Y- C. & Tsai, C- T. (2011), Comparing ANFIS and SEM in liner and nonlinear for casting of new product development performance, Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 6498-6507
Kandemir, R.C., & Rosanna G. (2006), an exploration of organizational factors in new product development success. The Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 21 (5), 300-310
Kazimierska, M., Grebosz, M. (2017), “New Product Development (NDP) Process an example of industrial sector”, management Systems in Production Engineering, 25 (4), 246-250
Kowang, Tan Owee., Sang Long, Choi., Rasli, Amran., (2014),” New Product Development Framework for Multinational Multi-locations Based Organizations in South East Asia” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol.129, 68-74
Langerak, F. & Hultink, E. J. (2005), The Import of new product Development Acceleration Approaches on Speed and Profitability: Lesson for Pioneers and Fast Followers, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 52 (1), 30-42
Liscoa, A., Skarmeas, d., & Lages, C. (2011), Entrepreneurial orientation, exploitative and explorative capabilities, and performance outcomes in export markets: A resourcebased approach. Industrial Marketing Management, 40 (8), 1274-1284
Lynn, G. S., Abel, K.D., Valentine, W.S. & Wright, R.C. (1999), Key Factors in Increasing Speed to Market and Improving New Product Success Rates ,Industrial Marketing Management, 28 (4), 319-326
McCarthy, I. P., Tsinopoulos, C., Allen, P., Rose-Anderssen, C., (2006), New product development as a complex adaptive system of decisions, J. Prod. Innovat. Manage, 23 (5), 437-456.
Mu. J, Peng. G, Tan. Y, (2007),” new product development in Chinese enterprise key successes factors managerial prospective”, international journal of emerging marketing, 2 (2), 123-143
Nonaka, I. (1998), Harvard business reviews on knowledge management. Harvard Business School Press: Boston, 21-45
Oh, J., Yang, J. & Lee, S. (2012), Managing uncertainty to improve decision-making in NDP portfolio management with a fuzzy expert system, Expert Systems with Applications, (39) 10, 9868-9885
O`Cass, A., Heirati, N. & Viet Ngo, L. (2014), Achieving new product success via the synchronization of exploration and exploitation across multiple levels and functional areas, Industrial Marketing Management, 43 (5), 862-872
Ren, J., Yusuf, Y., Burns, N.D., (2003), “The effect of agile attributes on competitive priorities: A neural network approach”, Integrated Manufacturing System, Vol.1416, 489-497
Rockart, J. F., (1979), chief executives define their own data needs, Harvard business review, 57, 81-93
Rubera, G., Ordanini, A., & Calantone, R. J. (2012), whether to integrate R & D and marketing. The effect of firm competence, Journal of product Innovation Management, 29 (5), 766-783
Sandelowski, M. & Barroso, J. (2003), Toward a Meta synthesis of qualitative findings on motherhood in HIV-positive women. Research in Nursing & Health, 26 (2), 153-170
Sheng, S., Zheng Zhou, K. & Lessassy, L. (2013), NDP speed us innovativeness: The contingent impact of institutional and market environments, Journal of Business Research, 66, 2355-2362
Suwannaporan, P., & Speece, M.W. (2010), assessing new product development success factors in The Thai food industry. British Food Journal, 112 (4), 364-386
Tavares, Raymond, (2009), Science and technology parks: An overview of theongoing initiatives in Africa, African Journal of political Science and International Relaions , Vol. 3 (5), 28-22
Tzokos, N., Hultink, E., Hart, S., (2004),”Navigating the new product process”, Industrial and marketing management. 33(7), 619–626
Ulrich, K. T., Eppinger, S. D., (2011), Product Design and Development, McGraw-Hill, Boston.
Van Geenhuizen M, Soetanto DP, (2009), Academic spin-offs at different ages: A case study in search of key obstacles to growth. Technovation, 31 (29), 671-81
Vincett P S. (2010), the economic impacts of academic spin-off companies, and their implications for public policy. Research Policy, Vol.39, 736-747
Wang Catherine, L: Ahmad perveiz, K. (2003), Structural Dimensions for Knowledge-Based Organizations, Measuring Business Excellence, Vol.17, 18-25
Zahra, S. A., Van de Velode, E. and Larraneta, B. (2007), “Knowledge conversion capability and the performance of corporate and university spin-offs”, Industrial and Corporate Change, 16 (4), 569-608.
Zonoozi, S., Ghahremanpour, P. (2019). Presenting the model of new product development based on customer relationship management and entrepreneurial orientation in Iran's dairy companies. Journal of Business Administration Researches. Online publishing from 2019 Nov, 2
Zimmer, L. (2006), Qualitative meta-synthesis: a question of dialoguing with texts, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 53 (3), 311–318.