تاثیر قابلیت‌های بازاریابی بر عملکرد صادراتی شرکت‌های کوچک و متوسط با میانجیگری مزیت رقابتی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 کارشناس ارشد مدیریت بازرگانی بین‌الملل، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه شاهد، تهران، ایران

2 استادیار گروه مدیریت بازرگانی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه شاهد، تهران، ایران

10.22034/jbar.2022.16484.4001

چکیده

مزیت رقابتی یکی از مهمترین عوامل موثر در موفقیت شرکت‌ها در بازارهای بین‌المللی است. تاکنون پژوهش‌های بسیاری در رابطه با تاثیر مزیت رقابتی بر عملکرد صادراتی صورت گرفته، اما تعداد کمی از آن‌ها به بررسی عوامل تعیین کننده مزیت رقابتی و نقش میانجی بالقوه آن در ارتباط میان قابلیت‌های بازاریابی و عملکرد صادراتی شرکت‌ها پرداخته‌اند. هدف این پژوهش بررسی تاثیر چهار قابلیت مهم بازاریابی (هوش بازار، نوآوری محصول، قیمت‌گذاری و ارتباطات بازاریابی) بر عملکرد صادراتی شرکت‌ها با توجه به نقش میانجی مزیت رقابتی است. جامعه آماری این پژوهش شرکت‌های صادراتی صنایع غذایی در استان تهران است و حجم نمونه با استفاده از فرمول کوکران 95 شرکت برآورد شد که از طریق روش نمونه‌گیری تصادفی ساده از میان جامعه استخراج گردید. این پژوهش از حیث هدف کاربردی و از حیث ماهیت و روش انجام کار از نوع توصیفی- پیمایشی بوده و داده‌های پژوهش از طریق پرسشنامه جمع‌آوری گردیده است. پس از تجزیه و تحلیل داد‌ه‌ها و آزمون فرضیه‌های پژوهش با استفاده از مدلسازی معادلات ساختاری به روش PLS، مشخص شد که دو مورد از قابلیت‌های مذکور، یعنی هوش بازار و قیمت‌گذاری بر کسب مزیت رقابتی تاثیر دارند. همچنین داده‌های پژوهش ارتباط بین مزیت رقابتی و عملکرد صادراتی را تایید می‌کند. علاوه‌ براین، نتایج نشان داد که مزیت رقابتی تنها در ارتباط میان قابلیت هوش بازار و عملکرد صادراتی و همچنین در ارتباط بین قابلیت قیمت‌گذاری و عملکرد صادراتی نقش میانجی دارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

The impact of marketing capabilities on SME’s export performance through the mediating effect of competitive advantage

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohammad Reza Fanaee 1
  • Mohsen Nazem Bokaee 2
1 MSc, Department of Business Management, Faculty of Humanities, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Business Management, Faculty of Humanities, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

Introduction: Small and medium enterprises (SMEs) play an important role for both economic growth and employment opportunities. Considering that SMEs can expand their market coverage through exporting, governments encourage SMEs to explore the international market for potential business growth. However, this has never been an easy task. SMEs need to achieve competitive advantage in order to compete with other industrial players around the world. Competitive advantage is one of the most important factors affecting the success of any firm in international markets. Previous studies have long discussed the role of the competitive advantage of firms as a determinant of export performance, but there are few studies on the determinants of firm competitive advantage and its potential mediating role in the relationship between marketing capabilities and export performance. The purpose of this study is to investigate the impacts of four essential export capabilities including product innovation, market intelligence, pricing and marketing communication on a firm’s export performance with the mediating role of competitive advantage. In this paper, we aim to shed light on the research gaps by investigating the essential capabilities associated with competitive advantage that may lead to SMEs' international performance and whether competitive advantage is a mediator to link these capabilities to SMEs' international performance. Understanding the essential capabilities which contribute to competitive advantage will guide SMEs that intend to explore international markets to assess their readiness. Policy makers and entrepreneurs can focus their capability development programs on capabilities strongly associated with competitive advantage for exporting SMEs.
Methodology: The population selected for the study consisted of the exporting firms in the food industry based in Tehran Province. The sample of the study was calculated using the Cochran formula with 95 firms randomly drawn from the respective population. Regarding the purpose, the study is an applied work carried out with a descriptive-survey research method, and the data were collected through a questionnaire. The Hypotheses of the study were tested using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). More specifically, we applied complete bootstrapping setting with 5000 subsamples, mean replacement for missing values and two-tailed test for hypothesis testing. SEM is particularly useful for testing complex models and when researchers need to incorporate latent variables. More specifically, we opted to apply the Partial Least Squares (PLS) SME approach, using the SmartPLS 3.2.8 software. The unidimensionality and reliability of the dataset were assessed through different procedures. The construct reliability was assessed by the degree to which the items were free from random errors and, therefore, they would yield consistent results. The reliability of the measures was also calculated using the composite reliability (CR) index and the average variance extracted (AVE) index. For all the measures, both indices were higher than the evaluation criteria, namely, 0.7 for the CR index and 0.5 for the AVE index.
Results and Discussion: Theoretically, this study provides empirical evidence on the determinants of competitive advantage and the mediating role of competitive advantage. The RBV theory suggests that only capabilities which are valuable, rare, inimitable, non-substitutable can be source of competitive advantage. In line with this argument, we examined whether all the four essential capabilities are ‘valuable’ to competitive advantage. In this sense, this study extends the findings of previous research on the relationships among organizational capabilities, competitive advantage and international performance. The results revealed that two of the mentioned capabilities (market intelligence and pricing) impact competitive advantage. In addition, the data analysis confirmed the relationship between competitive advantage and export performance. Moreover, the results indicated that competitive advantage only serves as a mediator between market intelligence capability and export performance as well as pricing capability and export performance.
Conclusion: According to the results of the study, market intelligence and pricing are two important capabilities which create competitive advantage for the exporting firms in the food industry. In other words, the competitive advantage of these firms depends upon their capability to respond to market intelligence and offer reasonable and fair prices in export markets. The present study is an effort to contribute to the literature on explaining the determinants of competitive advantage affecting the export performance of firms. Moreover, the results showed that only market intelligence and pricing capabilities have mediating effects on export performance through the competitive advantage. This proves the critical roles of these two capabilities for international success. Therefore, even though a firm can achieve competitive advantage through other capabilities, the extent to which it knows international markets, customers, rivals, and reasonable prices may be essential to capitalize the capabilities and take the most advantage of opportunities to achieve a favorable export performance. The findings of this investigation can be valuable to SMEs and startups that intend to explore or exploit opportunities in foreign markets.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Export performance
  • Competitive advantage
  • Marketing capabilities
  • Market intelligence
  • Pricing
Azar, A. and Momeni, M. (2002). Statistics in management. Tehran. SAMT Publication.
Barney, J. (1991), “Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage”, Journal of Management, 17(1): 99-120.
Beleska-Spasova, E., (2014). Determinants and measures of export performance: comprehensive literature review. J. Contemp. Econ. Bus. Issues 1 (1), 63–74.
Boso, Nathaniel, Adeolab, Ogechi, Dansoc, Albert, Assadiniad, Shahin (2018). The effect of export marketing capabilities on export performance: Moderating role of dysfunctional competition. Industrial Marketing Management, 10, 1-19.
Cavusgil, S.T. and Zou, S. (1994). Marketing strategy – performance relationship: an investigation of the empirical link in export market ventures. Journal of Marketing, 58, 1-21.
Chelliah, S., Sulaiman, M., Pandian, S., (2010). The determinants of internationalization of small and medium enterprises (Smes): a case in Malaysia. World Appl. Sci. J. 10, 1202–1215.
Davari, A. and Rezazadeh, A. (2017). Structural equation modeling using PLS Software. Tehran. Jahad Daneshgahi publication.
Day, G.S. (1994). The capabilities of market-driven organizations. J Mark 58 (4), 37–52.
Evangelista, F., & Mac, L. (2016). The influence of experience and deliberate learning on SME export performance. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 22, 860-879.
Falahat, Mohammad & Knight, Gary & Alon, Ilan. (2018). Orientations and capabilities of born global firms from emerging markets. International Marketing Review.
Falahat, Mohammad, Ramayah,T., Soto-Acostad, Pedro & Lee, Yan-Yin (2020).  SMEs internationalization: The role of product innovation, market intelligence, pricing and marketing communication capabilities as drivers of SMEs’ international performance. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 152, 1-7. 
Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. (1981). “Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error”. Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 39-50.
Hao, S., Song, M., 2016. Technology-driven strategy and firm performance: are strategic capabilities missing links. J. Bus. Res. 69 (2), 751–759.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. & Sinkovics, R. (2009). “The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing”. New Challenges to International Marketing. Vol. 20, pp. 277-320
Hofer, K.M., Niehoff-Hoeckner, L.M., Totzek, D., (2019). Organizing and implementing export pricing: performance effects and moderating factors. J. Int. Market. 27 (1),74–94.
Hooman, H. (1995). Structural equation modeling. Tehran. SAMT publication.
Kaleka, A., (2002). Resources and capabilities driving competitive advantage in export markets: guidelines for industrial exporters. Ind. Market. Manag. 31 (3), 273–283.
Kaleka, A., & Morgan, N. A. (2017). Which Competitive Advantage(s)? Competitive Advantage–Market Performance Relationships in International Markets. Journal of International Marketing, 25(4), 25–49.
Kamboj, S., Goyal, P., Rahman, Z., (2015). A resource-based view on marketing capability, operations capability and financial performance: an empirical examination of mediating role. Proced. Soc. Behav. Sci. 189, 406–415.
Katsikeas, C.S., 1994. Export competitive advantages: the relevance of firm characteristics. Int. Market. Rev. 11 (3), 33–53
Katsikeas, C.S. , Nigel F. Piercy, and Chriss Ioannidis (1996), “Determinants of Export Performance in a European Context,” European Journal of Marketing, 30 (6), 6–35.
Lee, T., Liu, H.M., (2018). How do firms with management ability promote competitive advantages? an integrated model from entrepreneurial strategy making and internal resources. Entrepreneursh. Res. J. 8 (2), 1–15.
Leonidou, L., Katsikeas, C.S. and Samiee, S. (2002), “Marketing strategy determinants of export performance: a meta-analysis”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 55 No. 1, pp. 51-67
Lim, J.S., T.W. Sharkey, and K.I. Kim (1996), “Identifying Managerial Influences on Export: Past Research and Future Directions,” International Marketing Review, 13 (1), 65–80.
Lu, Y., Zhou, L., Bruton, G., & Li, W. (2010). Capabilities as a mediator linking resources and the international performance of entrepreneurial firms in an emerging economy. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 41 (3), 419–436.
Mishra, C.S., Zachary, R.K., (2015). The theory of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneursh. Res. J.5 (4), 251–268.
Morgan, N.A., Zou, S., Vorhies, D.W. and Katsikeas, C.S. (2003), “Experiential and informational knowledge, architectural marketing capabilities, and the adaptive performance of export ventures: a cross-national study”, Decision Sciences.
Musso, F. and Francioni, B. (2014), “International strategy for SMEs: criteria for foreign markets and entry modes selection”, Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 301-312
Pham, T.S.H., Monkhouse, L.L., & Barnes, B.R. (2017). The influence of relational capability and marketing capabilities on the export performance of emerging market firms. Int. Market. Rev. 34 (5), 606–628.
Porter, M., (1985). The Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. Free Press, New York, NY.
Rua, O., França, A., Fernández Ortiz, R., (2018). Key drivers of SMEs export performance: the mediating effect of competitive advantage. J. Knowl. Manag. 22 (2), 257–279.
Sousa, C.M.P., Martinez-Lopez, F.J. and Coelho, F. (2008), “The determinants of export performance: a review of the research in the literature between 1998 and 2005”, International Journal of Management Reviews, Vol. 10 No. 4, pp. 343-374,
Takahashi, A.R.W., Bulgacov, S., Semprebon, E., Giacomini, M.M., (2016). Dynamic capabilities, marketing capability and organizational performance. Brazilian Bus. Rev. 14(5), 466–478.
Tan, Qun & Sousa, Carlos. (2015). Leveraging marketing capabilities into competitive advantage and export performance. International Marketing Review. 32. 78-102.
Vorhies, D.W. and Morgan, N.A. (2005), “Benchmarking marketing capabilities for sustainable competitive advantage”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 69 No. 1, pp. 80-94.
Weerawardena, J., (2003). The role of marketing capability in innovation-based competitive strategy. J. Strategic Market. 11 (1), 15–35.
Yang, Y., & Ju, X.F. (2018). Entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance: is product quality a missing link? Entrepreneur. Res. J. 8 (1), 1–13.
Zhang, Jing., & Zhu, Miao. (2015): Market orientation, product innovation and export performance: evidence from Chinese manufacturers, Journal of Strategic Marketing.
Zou, S., Fang, E., & Zhao, S. (2003). The effect of export marketing capabilities on export performance: an investigation of Chinese exporters. J. Int. Market. 11 (4), 32–55.
Zou, S., and S. Stan (1998), “The Determinants of Export Performance: A Review of the Empirical Literature Between1987–1997,” International Marketing Review, 15 (5), 333–56.