ترسیم آیندۀ رویکرد بازاریابی اقتصاد دایره‌ای با اتّکا به فناوری‌های دیجیتال در ایران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکترا، گروه مدیریت بازرگانی، واحد یزد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، یزد، ایران

2 استاد گروه مدیریت بازرگانی، واحد یزد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، یزد، ایران

3 دانشیار گروه مدیریت بازرگانی، واحد یزد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، یزد، ایران

4 دانشیار گروه اقتصاد، واحد یزد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، یزد، ایران

چکیده

تحولات اقتصادی و زیست‌محیطی جهان، رویکردهای نوینی را در حوزۀ توسعۀ پایدار مطرح کرده است که اقتصاد دایره‌ای یکی از مهم‌ترین آن‌ها محسوب می‌شود. این رویکرد، با تمرکز بر کاهش مصرف منابع، بازیافت، و بهینه‌سازی چرخۀ عمر محصولات، راهکاری برای کاهش اثرات زیست‌محیطی و افزایش بهره‌وری اقتصادی است. اقتصاد دایره‌ای به‌مثابه یک پارادایم جدید در اقتصاد کشورهای توسعه یافته و در حال توسعه ظهور و رشد کرده است تا به سازمان‌ها و شرکت‌ها در فضای دارای تحولات شدید کمک کند. این پژوهش، با استفاده از روش تحلیل اثرات متقابل و سناریونویسی، تلاش دارد آیندۀ اقتصاد دایره‌ای در ایران را تحت تأثیر فناوری‌های دیجیتال بررسی کند. در این راستا، شاخص مولفه‌های کلیدی براساس ماتریس اثرات متقابل با نرم‌افزار میک‌مک و تحلیل سناریوها با استفاده از نرم‌افزار سناریوویزارد مبنای شناسایی عوامل کلیدی اثرگذار بر این حوزه مورد استفاده قرار گرفت. تحقیق حاضر، از نوع توصیفی-اکتشافی می‌باشد که با رویکرد ترکیبی کمی-کیفی، انجام شده است. در گام اول، پژوهش از طریق تحلیل محتوا و مصاحبه با خبرگان شناسایی شاخص‌ها و مولفه‌ها  انجام و سپس در مرحله بعد، از طریق نرم‌افزار میک‌مک و سناریوویزارد، ۷۲۹ حالت مختلف متغیرها مورد بررسی قرار گرفت که در نهایت، با حذف حالات ناسازگار، ۷ سناریوی نهایی به‌دست آمد. تحلیل کیفی سناریوهای نهایی بیانگر آن است که تحقق رویکرد بازاریابی اقتصاد دایره‌ای در بستر فناوری‌های دیجیتال نه تنها وابسته به رشد فناوری است، بلکه مستلزم تغییرات بنیادی در سیاست‌گذاری، فرهنگ‌سازی، آموزش و تحول در ساختارهای بازاریابی و کسب‌وکار است. از این منظر، آینده نه از دل روندهای صرفاً فناورانه، بلکه در تعامل پیچیده بین بازیگران مختلف شکل می‌گیرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Mapping the Future of the Circular Economy Marketing Approach in the Context of Digital Technologies in Iran

نویسندگان [English]

  • seyed mojtaba mousavizadeh 1
  • shahnaz nayebzadeh 2
  • seyed hasan hatami nasab 3
  • zohreh tabatabaie nasab 4
1 , PhD Student, Department of Management, Ya. C., Islamic Azad University, Yazd, Iran
2 Professor, Department of Management, Ya. C., Islamic Azad University, Yazd, Iran
3 Associate Professor, Department of Management, Ya. C., Islamic Azad University, Yazd, Iran
4 Associate Professor, Department of Economy, Ya. C., Islamic Azad University, Yazd, Iran
چکیده [English]

EXTENDED ABSTRACT
 
Introduction: Global economic and environmental transformations have introduced new approaches to sustainable development, among which the circular economy stands out as one of the most significant. The circular economy has emerged as a key strategy to minimize environmental impacts and enhance economic efficiency by focusing on resource consumption reduction, recycling, and product lifecycle optimization. It has developed into a new paradigm in both developed and developing countries, assisting organizations and companies in navigating environments characterized by rapid changes. This study, using the Scenario Wizard method, seeks to explore the future of the circular economy in Iran under the influence of digital technologies. Scenario analysis was employed to identify the key factors affecting this domain, and based on the Cross-Impact Matrix (MICMAC), critical components were determined. Subsequently, utilizing the Scenario Wizard algorithm, several plausible scenarios for the future of the circular economy in Iran were developed.
Methodology: This research is descriptive-exploratory and was conducted through a mixed-methods (quantitative-qualitative) approach. In the first phase, content analysis and expert interviews were used to identify indicators and components. In the next stage, using MICMAC and Scenario Wizard software, 729 different combinations of variables were analyzed. After eliminating incompatible scenarios, seven final scenarios were formulated. These scenarios were categorized into four main quadrants of the scenario dispersion analysis based on their level of consistency and impact.
Discussion and Results: The findings indicate that Scenario 1 represents the most desirable future configuration, depicting a context in which an “aware society” interacts synergistically with a “smart government” to facilitate the advancement of a circular economy. In contrast, Scenarios 3 and 4 function as warning scenarios, suggesting that neglecting critical domains such as employment and innovation may redirect the trajectory of the circular economy toward structural stagnation or even systemic crisis.
Structural analysis was conducted using MICMAC, while scenario development was performed through Scenario Wizard. The analytical output illustrates the interaction patterns among key variables and the spectrum of plausible future scenarios. Results from the cross-impact analysis reveal a relatively high level of interdependency among the selected variables. Specifically, 131 relationships were assigned a value of zero (indicating no influence), 120 relationships reflected weak influence (1), 66 indicated moderately strong influence (2), and 44 demonstrated strong influence (3). Overall, 230 relationships were non-zero, and the matrix fill rate was calculated at 63.71%, indicating substantial structural interconnectedness and systemic complexity.
Considering three possible states for each of the six principal criteria, a total of 729 theoretical scenarios could be generated. However, a significant proportion of these scenarios lacked logical coherence or internal consistency and were therefore excluded from further analysis. Consequently, during the scenario refinement phase, a maximum inconsistency threshold of –1 was applied in the software to retain only those scenarios that were relatively coherent, analytically robust, and realistically plausible.
Conclusion: The results of the third stage presented a multidimensional picture of the future of the circular economy marketing approach based on digital technologies. Some scenarios showed that if innovation is effectively supported, institutional coordination and investment in public culture are implemented, a transformative future will be formed in which sustainable and competitive marketing will be presented as a key advantage in Iran. In contrast, pessimistic scenarios warn that neglect of culture, weak systemic governance and stagnation of innovation could lead to a critical future, a future in which consumer trust decreases, elites migrate and economic capacities are destroyed. Qualitative analysis of the final scenarios shows that the realization of the digital circular economy does not depend solely on technological advances. It also requires fundamental changes in policymaking, cultural development, education and transformations in marketing and business structures. From this perspective, the future will emerge not simply through technological trends, but through complex interactions between different stakeholders, demonstrating that the future of circular economy marketing in Iran is not a predetermined path, but rather an arena of strategic choices and decisions, choices that, if properly guided, can place Iran in a position of competitive transformation, and if neglected, will lead the country towards crisis and structural inefficiency.  

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Circular Economy
  • Digital Technologies
  • Scenario Wizard
  • Driver Analysis
  • Marketing Approach
  1. Andersson, H & M. O. Johansson, (2019), Technological Innovations for Environmental Sustainability: Circular Economy Pathways". Sustainable Development. https://Doi.org/10.1016/j.10.1002/sd.1965.

    Amer, M., Daim, T. U., & Jetter, A. (2013). A review of scenario planning. Futures, 46, 23-40.

    Alonso, A., Bressers, H., & Martín, E. (2020). Policy integration and circular economy implementation: A comparative analysis of Spain and The Netherlands. Sustainability, 12(20), 8349.

    Antikainen, M., & Valkokari, K. (2018). A framework for sustainable circular business model innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 177, 721-734.

    Antikainen, M., & Valkokari, K. (2016). A framework for sustainable circular business model innovation. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(7), 5-12.

    ArtificiaWilts, H., Galinski, L., & von Gries, N. (2018). Digitalisation for the circular economy: Implications for sustainability and policy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 205, 1503-1512.

    Balde, C. P., Forti, V., Gray, V., Kuehr, R., & Stegmann, P. (2017). The Global E-waste Monitor 2017: Quantities, Flows, and Resources. United Nations University.

    Benyus, J. M. (2002). Biomimicry: Innovation inspired by nature. Harper Perennial.

    BockenGodet, M. (2006). Creating Futures: Scenario Planning as a Strategic Management Tool. Economica.

    Bocken, N. M., Short, S. W. (2021). Circular economy and business model innovation. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 25(2), 207-221.

    Bocken, N. M., de Pauw, I., Bakker, C., & van der Grinten, B. (2016). Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 33(5), 308-320.

    Bocken, N. M. P., Short, S. W., Rana, P., & Evans, S. (2014). A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 42-56. https://Doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.039.

    Botsman, R., & Rogers, R. (2010). What's Mine Is Yours: The Rise of Collaborative Consumption. Harper Business.

    Bradfield, R., Wright, G., Burt, G., Cairns, G., & Van Der Heijden, K. (2005). The origins and evolution of scenario techniques in long range business planning. Futures, 37(8), 795-812.

    Bressanelli, G., Perona, M., & Saccani, N. (2018). Challenges in supply chain redesign for the Circular Economy: A literature review and a multiple case study. International Journal of Production Research, 56(4), 1366-1386.

    Brian S. Y. Lim, Charlotte F. D. Chan, (2020), "Entrepreneurial Innovation in the Circular Economy: Exploring the Role of Digital Technologies", Sustainability. https://Doi.org/10.1016/j.10.3390/su12010013.

    Chamberlin, L., & Boks, C. (2018). An exploration of factors influencing the design of sustainable packaging. Journal of Cleaner Production, 193, 23–36.

    Christos S. Savva, Maria P. Papatheodorou, (2020), "Digital Transformation in Circular Economy Business Models: The Role of Entrepreneurs", Journal of Cleaner Production. https://Doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.1210.

    Di Maio, F., Rem, P. C., Baldé, K., & Polder, M. (2017). Measuring resource efficiency and circular economy: A market value approach. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 122, 163–171.

    Deloitte (2020). The circular economy handbook: Realizing the circular advantage. Deloitte Insights.

    Deloitt, W. R. (2016). The circular economy. Nature News, 531(7595), 435.

    DeloittSaberi, S., Kouhizadeh, M., Sarkis, J., & Shen, L. (2019). Blockchain technology and its relationships to sustainable supply chain management. International Journal of Production Research, 57(7), 2117-2135.

    David M. Duguay, Sophie A. Maguire, (2019), "Circular Economy and Digital Marketing: A Guide for Entrepreneurs", Business Strategy and the Environment. https://Doi.org/10.1016/j/10.1002/bse.2479.

    European Commission. (2020). A new Circular Economy Action Plan: For a cleaner and more competitive Europe. Brussels: EC.

    Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2021). The Circular Economy in Detail. Retrieved from EllenMacArthurFoundation.org.

    Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2020). Artificial intelligence and the circular economy. Retrieved from www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org.

    Guldmann, E, (2021), Digital technologies and the circular economy: Insights from leading companies. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 26, 155-167. https://Doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.11.015.

    Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C., & De Michelis, F, (2016), The expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and industrial systems. A review of circular economy: Conservation and Recycling, 106,32-41. https://Doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.10.021.

    Ghisellini, P., Ripa, M., & Ulgiati, S. (2022). Exploring the relationship between circular economy and sustainable marketing: A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 330, 129795. https://Doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129795. 

    Godet, M. (2000). The art of scenarios and strategic planning: Tools and pitfalls. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 65(1), 3-22.

    Godet, M., & Roubelat, F. (1996). Creating the future: The use and misuse of scenarios. Futures, 28(1), 15-29.

    Godet, M., & Durance, P. (2011). Strategic Foresight for Corporate and Regional Development. DUNOD.

    Geng, Y., & Doberstein, B, (2020), The Role of Digital Transformation in Achieving a Circular Economy". Resources, Conservation & Recycling. https://Doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104658.

    Geng, Y., & H. Fu, & H. Zhu, (2020), "Environmental Sustainability and the Circular Economy: A Framework for Achieving a Digital Future". Environmental Impact Assessment Review. https://Doi.org/10.1016j.eiar.2020.106371. 

    Zott, C., & Amit, R. (2010). Business model design: An activity system perspective. Long Range Planning, 43(2-3), 216-226. https://Doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.005.

    Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M., & Hultink, E. J. (2017). The Circular Economy–A new sustainability paradigm? Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 757-768.

    Hobson, K., & Lynch, N. (2016). Diversifying and de-growing the circular economy. Geoforum, 77, 148-156.

    Hobson, K., & Lynch, N. (2016). Diversifying and de-growing the circular economy: Radical social transformation in a resource-scarce world. Futures, 82, 15-25.

    Jafarzadeh, S., & Ghaderi, H. (2020). Challenges and opportunities of circular economy in Iran: A systematic review. Sustainability, 12(5), 1854.

    Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., & Hekkert, M. (2017). Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 127, 221-232. https://Doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005. 

    Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., & Hekkert, M. (2020). Circular Economy and Sustainability in the Digital Age". Journal of Cleaner Production (2020). https://Doi.org/10.1016/j/jclepro.2020.122894.

    Kiron, D., Unruh, G., & Kruschwitz, N. (2017). The benefits of sustainability-driven innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 58(4), 11-13.

    Kotler, P., & Armstrong, G. (2021). Principles of Marketing (18th ed.). Pearson Education.

    Kumar, V., & Petersen, A. (2024). Digital transformation and sustainable marketing: Reimagining value creation through circular strategies. Journal of Business Research, 168, 114298. https://Doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114298.

    Lyle, J. T., & Clark, B. (1994). Regenerative Design for Sustainable Development. Wiley.

    Lewandowski, M., A. (2020). Framework for Assessing the Impact of Digitalization on Circular Economy Practices".  Sustainable Development. https://Doi.org/10.1016/j/10.1002/.2062.

    Lacy, P., & Rutqvist, J, (2018), Digital Technologies and Circular Economy: An Integrated Approach". Sustainable Business. https://Doi.org/10.1016/j10.1108/SAMPJ-07-2017-0222. 

    Ludeke-Freund, F., Gold, S., & Bocken, N. M. P. (2019). A review and typology of circular economy business model patterns. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 23(1), 36-61.

    McDonough, W., & Braungart, M. (2008). Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things. North Point Press.

    Martina C. M. K, Digitalization and the Circular Economy: Opportunities and Challenges". (2020). Journal of Cleaner Production (2020). https://Doi.org/10.1016/j/.2020.121298.

    Mark Thompson, Patricia Martinez. (2021). "Digital Culture and its Impact on Social Change: A Case of Digital Economy and Circularity".  Social Change Review. https://Doi.org/10.1016/j10.1007/s13754-020-00299-3.

    Morris, M., Schindehutte, M., & Allen, J. (2002). The entrepreneur's business model: Toward a unified perspective. Journal of Business Research, 58(6), 726–735.

    Netherlands Government. (2016). A Circular Economy in the Netherlands by 2050 – Government-wide Programme.

    Nicholas L. Barrington, Jonathan W. Williams, (2021), "The Role of Digital Entrepreneurship in the Circular Economy: A Case Study Approach", Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. https://Doi.org/10.1016/j.10.1177/1042258721992134.

    1. Lacy, J. Rutqvist, & M. S. Bergvall, (2019), Shifting to Circular Economy: A Digital Pathway to Sustainability". Nature Sustainability. https://Doi.org/10.1016/j.10.1038/s41893-019-0253.

    Peattie, K., & Crane, A. (2005). Green marketing: Legend, myth, farce or prophesy? Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 8(4), 357–370.

    Petty, R. D., & Cram, T. (2005). Sustainable marketing: An ethical approach to value creation. Journal of Marketing Management, 21(5–6), 697–721. https://Doi.org/10.1362/0267257054307401.

    Rockstrom, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., et al. (2009). A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461(7263), 472-475.

    1. S. M. Ismail, J. T. F. Hong, (2021), "Circular Economy and Digital Marketing: Exploring Entrepreneurial Opportunities", Journal of Business Research. https://Doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.11.055.

    Saberi, S., Kouhizadeh, M., Sarkis, J., & Shen, L. (2019). Blockchain technology and its relationships to sustainable supply chain management. International Journal of Production Research, 57(7), 2117-2135.

    Stahel r, J., Reike, D., & Hekkert, M. (2018). Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 127, 221-232.

    Thongplew, N., Koh, L., Tan, K. H., & Yip, N. (2022). Unlocking circular economy practices in Asia: A stakeholder perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 337, 130427.

    United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. New York: UN.

    Van der Heijden, K. (2005). Scenarios: The Art of Strategic Conversation. John Wiley & Sons.

    Van Notten, P. W. F., Rotmans, J., van Asselt, M. B. A., & Rothman, D.S. (2003). An updated scenario typology. Futures, 35(5): 423–443. https://Doi.org/10.1016/s0016-3287(02)00090-3.

    Verhagen, Y. (2023). Digital technologies as enablers of circular innovation in supply chains. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 195, 106786. https://Doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106786.

    Wright, G., Bradfield, R., & Cairns, G. (2013). Does the intuitive logics method–and its recent enhancements–produce effective scenarios? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(4), 631-642.

    World Economic Forum. (2020). The Future of the Circular Economy. Geneva: WEF.

    Ward, B., & Boulding, K. (1996). Only One Earth: The Care and Maintenance of a Small Planet. Penguin Books.

    Wang, L., & Zhang, Y. (2025). The role of smart technologies in advancing circular economy business models: A cross-sectoral analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 196, 122497. https://Doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.122497.